M
me
why not concentrate on cookies..?...why would they make a
antispyware..not detect cookies..
antispyware..not detect cookies..
me said:why not concentrate on cookies..?...why would they make a
antispyware..not detect cookies..
Hiwhy not concentrate on cookies..?...why would they make a
antispyware..not detect cookies..
-----Original Message-----
me said:why not concentrate on cookies..?...why would they make a
antispyware..not detect cookies..
Because cookies cannot damage your PC, or Windows, or any of your software
or settings. They are just passive items of text.
We have much more dangerous things to worry about.
--
Robin Walker [MVP Networking]
(e-mail address removed)
.
plun said:And I will always remove these "Tracking Cockonuts" as a
small challenge ! until someone can explain benefits with them.
The benefits, which you and other internet users enjoy, is that many
resources on the internet are free of charge to the end-user. But nothing is
free of cost, and in many cases the costs of the so-called "free" resources
are met by advertising. The tracking cookies enable, for instance, internet
sales companies to reward the site that carried the advert that led to the
customer coming to the sales site, rather than spreading their advertising
budget around willy-nilly on unproductive sites..
The alternative to accepting the existence of advertising on the internet is
that you will have to be prepared to pay more for the resources you exploit
on the internet. Advertising is not intrinsically evil. You might not like
it, and you are free to seek to avoid receiving it, but like it or not, you
do receive benefit from it. It's not just the fat cats in the boardrooms who
benefit, it's you as well. Somewhere in the world, someone else is paying
for the free resources that you exploit on the internet.
If the user wants to have it, then why not giving it to
him ?