J
jaguarxj6
do you people know there is a very easy way to convert your dual core into a
quad and its inexspensive
quad and its inexspensive
VistaRookie said:Sounds like that computer would be SMOKIN' fast!!!
No, you just plug into a 240 V line instead of 120 V. Then it runs
twice as fast.
steve
Charlie Tame said:You have not heard of the old "Duct tape one CPU on top of the other
trick".
PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
what are you smoking, kid?
jaguarxj6 wrote:
do you people know there is a very easy way to convert your dual core
into a
quad and its inexspensive
--
VistaRookie
10% of my brain lives with me. The other 90% can be found
here:
'*Google*' (http://www.google.com)
Posted via http://www.vistaheads.com
Steve said:Yeah, I left that part out. <VBG>
steve
VistaRookie said:Sounds like that computer would be SMOKIN' fast!!!
No, you just plug into a 240 V line instead of 120 V. Then it runs
twice as fast.
steve
You have not heard of the old "Duct tape one CPU on top of the other
trick".
PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
what are you smoking, kid?
jaguarxj6 wrote:
do you people know there is a very easy way to convert your dual
core
into a
quad and its inexspensive
--
VistaRookie
10% of my brain lives with me. The other 90% can be found
here:
'*Google*' (http://www.google.com)
Posted via http://www.vistaheads.com
Charlie Tame said:I liked the "Duel" core post, let them fight it out and see who wins?
Steve said:Yeah, I left that part out. <VBG>
steve
VistaRookie said:Sounds like that computer would be SMOKIN' fast!!!
Steve Cochran;1606844 Wrote:
No, you just plug into a 240 V line instead of 120 V. Then it runs
twice as fast.
steve
You have not heard of the old "Duct tape one CPU on top of the other
trick".
PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
what are you smoking, kid?
jaguarxj6 wrote:
do you people know there is a very easy way to convert your dual
core
into a
quad and its inexspensive
--
Please post back if you find the solution, it helps others. Thanks.
Charlie Tame
--
VistaRookie
10% of my brain lives with me. The other 90% can be found
here:
'*Google*' (http://www.google.com)
Posted via http://www.vistaheads.com