Jeroen said:
Hmmm I believr yo but vould you please clarify :
That memory is intended for use on registered modules.
What is (un)registered and what is the use of it?
Multiple modules? I have 2 * 1024? What do you mean by: "the loading
should be
too much"?
thanx for replying.
Unregistered modules using 128Mx4 means there are 16 chips in one
bank. Not the more normal 8 chips. Any control signals which
normally drive 8 chips (control signals that are per-bank)
receive twice the loading.
http://www.portatech.com/catalog/memory.asp?ID=285
"Select this Value High Density (128x4 Based) 1GB module
if you have a system or motherboard with an SIS 648, 648fx,
746fx chipsets or Via P4X266A, KT600, PT800 chipsets."
AFAIK, Intel does not approve of modules with x4, but you
are welcome to experiment if you want. If one of those
modules doesn't work, then at least you have some kind
of explanation for why.
Intel memory guide for 875P chipset
ftp://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/applnots/25273001.pdf
"The following configurations are not valid:
* 64-Mb and 1-Gb Memory Technology
* x4,x32 DIMMS <----
* Double Sided X16 DIMMS
* Registered DIMMS."
The normal x8 modules would be acceptable, by that set of
rules.
Mushkin used to have a series of web pages, concerning the
testing of various memory configurations. They had a special
section on stacked 1GB DIMMs, and their testing showed that
while some chipsets, like the VIA and SIS chipset, could
drive the modules, there were hardly any chipsets that could
drive two or three modules. Since Mushkin made those web
pages uncacheable, I can no longer provide a reference
to them for you, or details of which chipsets were the
best.
By steering people towards modules using x8 chips, I'm
trying to ensure that when the modules are reused in a
new motherboard, there won't be problems with them. Why
invest in memory modules that won't work in all
motherboards ?
Paul