compatible fax programs for vista home premium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Since home premium does not have the fax program in it..just wondering if
there is one out there that will work with 32 and 64 bit...changing to 64 bit
soon as the dvd gets here
 
What kind of fax load are you talking about? If it's small, it might be
cheaper and easier to just use one of the internet faxing sites. For the
couple of faxes I send/receive each year, I use eFax and Fax1. I think the
Microsoft Office Marketplace might have more options.
 
I agree. As the number of users who still have an analog fax modem continues
to decline, Internet Fax Services are filling this need. Any of the ones
that are approved to integrate with Outlook should be fine. I've used Venali
with good success
(http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/marketplace/EM010954981033.aspx?pid=CE010171881033),
and many of these firms are recognizing the need to present packages for low
volume users.

Another option, of course, arises when you realize that a simple standalone
fax machine costs less than the price difference between Vista Home and
Ultimate ;)
 
I have, in a pinch, also sent a document I needed to fax as an
attachment to an email (with faxing instructions) to someone who can
then fax it for you. My daughter did this for me when I could not fax
and could not get to a faxing outlet (like a Kinko's) because we were
having a blizzard at the time.
 
It really depends on your needs. There are many businesses that still rely
on faxes and cannot use e-mail. Most people don't realize that sending an
'internet fax' is really just sending a document to a third party, who then
actually sends the fax for you via telephone lines. Its not secure because
the fax has to go through a third-party. Most of these fax services charge
per page, and some also charge a monthly service charge and in reality you
could end of paying a lot more for faxing that you could do yourself - which
is just as easy and much more secure.

Yes, there are advantages of internet faxing, you don't need any extra
hardware or software or a telephone line to use, but the cost of a fax modem
is so cheap to buy anyway. Most already have the telephone line. The price
you'd pay for a month of service of internet fax could pay for your analog
fax modem. Cost of long distance in North America per minute now is
actually less than the per page prices some of these fax services charge.
For example, a 3 minute call at 6 cents a minute (lets say 3 average text
pages) might cost you 18 cents while some services will charge you 10-15
cents per page.

The ideal solution is to have an internet "pay as you use" service, and an
analogue fax modem (w/software) you can use when you need it.

Russ Valentine said:
I agree. As the number of users who still have an analog fax modem
continues to decline, Internet Fax Services are filling this need. Any of
the ones that are approved to integrate with Outlook should be fine. I've
used Venali with good success
(http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/marketplace/EM010954981033.aspx?pid=CE010171881033),
and many of these firms are recognizing the need to present packages for
low volume users.

Another option, of course, arises when you realize that a simple
standalone fax machine costs less than the price difference between Vista
Home and Ultimate ;)
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
David A. Lessnau said:
What kind of fax load are you talking about? If it's small, it might be
cheaper and easier to just use one of the internet faxing sites. For the
couple of faxes I send/receive each year, I use eFax and Fax1. I think
the Microsoft Office Marketplace might have more options.
 
dont have a lot but at times need to send things back to work

G said:
It really depends on your needs. There are many businesses that still rely
on faxes and cannot use e-mail. Most people don't realize that sending an
'internet fax' is really just sending a document to a third party, who then
actually sends the fax for you via telephone lines. Its not secure because
the fax has to go through a third-party. Most of these fax services charge
per page, and some also charge a monthly service charge and in reality you
could end of paying a lot more for faxing that you could do yourself - which
is just as easy and much more secure.

Yes, there are advantages of internet faxing, you don't need any extra
hardware or software or a telephone line to use, but the cost of a fax modem
is so cheap to buy anyway. Most already have the telephone line. The price
you'd pay for a month of service of internet fax could pay for your analog
fax modem. Cost of long distance in North America per minute now is
actually less than the per page prices some of these fax services charge.
For example, a 3 minute call at 6 cents a minute (lets say 3 average text
pages) might cost you 18 cents while some services will charge you 10-15
cents per page.

The ideal solution is to have an internet "pay as you use" service, and an
analogue fax modem (w/software) you can use when you need it.

Russ Valentine said:
I agree. As the number of users who still have an analog fax modem
continues to decline, Internet Fax Services are filling this need. Any of
the ones that are approved to integrate with Outlook should be fine. I've
used Venali with good success
(http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/marketplace/EM010954981033.aspx?pid=CE010171881033),
and many of these firms are recognizing the need to present packages for
low volume users.

Another option, of course, arises when you realize that a simple
standalone fax machine costs less than the price difference between Vista
Home and Ultimate ;)
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
David A. Lessnau said:
What kind of fax load are you talking about? If it's small, it might be
cheaper and easier to just use one of the internet faxing sites. For the
couple of faxes I send/receive each year, I use eFax and Fax1. I think
the Microsoft Office Marketplace might have more options.




Since home premium does not have the fax program in it..just wondering
if
there is one out there that will work with 32 and 64 bit...changing to
64 bit
soon as the dvd gets here
 
Not cheaper Russ if you need to move from Office 2000 to a later
version. Still it is something to be borne in mind.




~~~~

Gerry

~~~~~~~~
Enquire, plan and execute.
Stourport, England
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Always. Not sure why anyone who is using Office 2000 or 2002 would even
consider an upgrade to Vista since neither is compatible with Vista.
 
Russ

The upgrade advisor does point this out. You are the first to mention
it and I have looking at Vista upgrade issues for several weeks now.
Can you point to a link covering this point.

TIA


--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Russ

A brief excursion in Google supports what you say about Outlook 2000,
Vista Mail can be used instead of Outlook I have Outlook but I have
never taken to it. I prefer Outlook Express.

You said that Office 2000 is not compatile. Whilst Outlook is
important to some users it is hardly the major player in the Office
suite. Do you know of any other incompatibles? You may not agree but
Word and Excel are two key programmes.


--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
No. Sorry. I have no idea how the other programs are faring in Vista. Since
both Office 2000 and XP are out of support, I doubt we'll see any official
documentation.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
Gerry Cornell said:
Russ

A brief excursion in Google supports what you say about Outlook 2000,
Vista Mail can be used instead of Outlook I have Outlook but I have never
taken to it. I prefer Outlook Express.

You said that Office 2000 is not compatile. Whilst Outlook is important to
some users it is hardly the major player in the Office suite. Do you know
of any other incompatibles? You may not agree but Word and Excel are two
key programmes.


--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well documented in m.p.outlook groups
Russ

The upgrade advisor does point this out. You are the first to
mention it and I have looking at Vista upgrade issues for
several weeks now. Can you point to a link covering this point.

TIA


--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] wrote:
Always. Not sure why anyone who is using Office 2000 or 2002
would even consider an upgrade to Vista since neither is
compatible with Vista.
Not cheaper Russ if you need to move from Office 2000 to a
later version. Still it is something to be borne in mind.




~~~~

Gerry

~~~~~~~~
Enquire, plan and execute.
Stourport, England
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Russ

One of your fellow MVPs has told me that Office 2000 is on Extended
Support and that a KB Article regarding compatabilty with Vista is
being prepared. There will be no updates for Office 2000 or Office
2002 but an SP update is to be issued for Office 2003. The problem you
have mentioned was the only one she knew about.

--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


No. Sorry. I have no idea how the other programs are faring in
Vista. Since both Office 2000 and XP are out of support, I doubt
we'll see any official documentation.
Russ

A brief excursion in Google supports what you say about Outlook
2000, Vista Mail can be used instead of Outlook I have Outlook
but I have never taken to it. I prefer Outlook Express.

You said that Office 2000 is not compatile. Whilst Outlook is
important to some users it is hardly the major player in the
Office suite. Do you know of any other incompatibles? You may
not agree but Word and Excel are two key programmes.


--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well documented in m.p.outlook groups

Russ

The upgrade advisor does point this out. You are the first to
mention it and I have looking at Vista upgrade issues for
several weeks now. Can you point to a link covering this point.

TIA


--

Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] wrote:
Always. Not sure why anyone who is using Office 2000 or 2002
would even consider an upgrade to Vista since neither is
compatible with Vista.
Not cheaper Russ if you need to move from Office 2000 to a
later version. Still it is something to be borne in mind.




~~~~

Gerry

~~~~~~~~
Enquire, plan and execute.
Stourport, England
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Back
Top