R
richard.giuli
HI all,
My background is that we have CE 4.2 devices deployed in the field. We
are adding new software and I would like to write a CF 2.0 app that
uses C# and pinvoke. I got this to work by writing the C++ and C# apps
in MSVC 2005, targetting the correct processor and then deploying by
hand. The problem is that I can't debug it from MSVC 2005.
Our devices are already deployed, so there is no chance of getting new
ones with a more modern os. I could always revert to using MSVC 2003
and embedded tools 4.0, but it would be _very nice_ to get MSVC 2005 to
work so I can use CF 2.0 and debug.
I am looking for some clarification on this topic. From searching
online I have determined that:
1. MSVC 2005 does not support Windows CE 4.2 devices. You cannot
deploy or debug.
2. Compact Framework 2.0 _is supported on CE 4.2_. I downloaded the
cab file and wrote a sample app, and it seems to work well.
3. Only MSVC 2005 supports CF 2.0 debugging.
Anyone please correct me if any of the above points are incorrect...
thanks in advance.
Regarding CF 2.0 support, as a developer I see a big disconnect here:
You can run a CF 2.0 app on a CE 4.2 device, but you cannot debug and
deploy it from MSVC 2005. Is there any good reason why this
functionality did not make it into MSVC 2005? If Microsoft doesn't
support development of CF 2.0 apps for Windows CE 4.2, then why did
they release CF 2.0 for CE 4.2? I am confused. Are there plans to add
this support to MSVC 2005?
it would be nice to get an official answer to this question. If anyone
else out there knows how I can debug using MSVC 2005, I would greatly
appreciate the help. I was actually able to get MSVC 2005 to start
deployment by telling it the device is a pocket pc 2003 device (but it
is actually 2002). However, the cab files it deploys specify CE 5.0 as
the min version. I am currently trying to modify these cab files by
hand, install them and initiate a remote debugging session. This is
painful though and I am hoping someone out there can advise a better
solution. My last resort is to go back to MSVC 2003 and CF 1.0 if I
can't make headway here.
Thanks,
Rich
My background is that we have CE 4.2 devices deployed in the field. We
are adding new software and I would like to write a CF 2.0 app that
uses C# and pinvoke. I got this to work by writing the C++ and C# apps
in MSVC 2005, targetting the correct processor and then deploying by
hand. The problem is that I can't debug it from MSVC 2005.
Our devices are already deployed, so there is no chance of getting new
ones with a more modern os. I could always revert to using MSVC 2003
and embedded tools 4.0, but it would be _very nice_ to get MSVC 2005 to
work so I can use CF 2.0 and debug.
I am looking for some clarification on this topic. From searching
online I have determined that:
1. MSVC 2005 does not support Windows CE 4.2 devices. You cannot
deploy or debug.
2. Compact Framework 2.0 _is supported on CE 4.2_. I downloaded the
cab file and wrote a sample app, and it seems to work well.
3. Only MSVC 2005 supports CF 2.0 debugging.
Anyone please correct me if any of the above points are incorrect...
thanks in advance.
Regarding CF 2.0 support, as a developer I see a big disconnect here:
You can run a CF 2.0 app on a CE 4.2 device, but you cannot debug and
deploy it from MSVC 2005. Is there any good reason why this
functionality did not make it into MSVC 2005? If Microsoft doesn't
support development of CF 2.0 apps for Windows CE 4.2, then why did
they release CF 2.0 for CE 4.2? I am confused. Are there plans to add
this support to MSVC 2005?
it would be nice to get an official answer to this question. If anyone
else out there knows how I can debug using MSVC 2005, I would greatly
appreciate the help. I was actually able to get MSVC 2005 to start
deployment by telling it the device is a pocket pc 2003 device (but it
is actually 2002). However, the cab files it deploys specify CE 5.0 as
the min version. I am currently trying to modify these cab files by
hand, install them and initiate a remote debugging session. This is
painful though and I am hoping someone out there can advise a better
solution. My last resort is to go back to MSVC 2003 and CF 1.0 if I
can't make headway here.
Thanks,
Rich