W
WolfGang
Having updated to AVG7 w/ some suggestions from this ng to overcome email
config issues, I find that it works fine for me. Working with the new
control center and setting up the email took a bit of digging in the FAQs
but once I understood the changes, in some ways I find them better.
I have WINXP, a large HD, and a lot of RAM so I don't have some of the
issues I read about here re: taking too much CPU. The problems many people
on this forum have seem to be related either to not yet having a grasp on
setting AVG7 up; related to process priority and CPU usage in task
manager.--often from people having setups other than XP, using Windows 98 or
other. Or they might use programs of alternative flavors. A lot say that
AVAST works better for them. It seems people with laptops often say that.
From these observations it seems that maybe AVG7 is not good for every
computer based on these variables, as maybe AVG6 was. I wonder if this is
some kind of refitting on the part of Grisoft in the same sense as with MS
pulling support for (what they consider to be) outdated OSs.
I was lucky(?) enough to come back in to computing recently with Windows at
a school, then XP in my own first computer and it has been relatively smooth
sailing. From reading Langa, etc. though, I am aware that many people still
like DOS, or have liitle use for upgrading hardware, etc. They ought to be
used to changes not working well retroactively by now but I appreciate that
they don't have to like it. I know a guy who recently chose to buy a used
computer that used DOS for some reason, over buying a new one..
A guy like me who used to have to input stacks of data cards in a reader at
NJ State College and wait up to several days for the printouts that came
from the computer at Rutgers with my Psych experiment results; then years
later took enough Data Processing courses to appreciate DOS as being the
hard way, for me; I like to celebrate the changes that upgrade the GUI the
most.
So before you say AVG7 sucks, or AVAST rules, or whatever, consider that
things change and will keep on upgrading and it is your choice about whether
to like it or leave it, but realize that as things change they need to be
looked at differently and won't always be consistent with retroactive ideas
and hardware. Most everything nowadays is instant and disposable anyway. The
energy it takes to object to something post after post could be used to see
where what you have fits and be happy there will always be something that
works if something else doesn't. You know what sucks?--if you happened to
drop that stack of cards on the way to the reader after punching in all the
data with one-finger typing, that's what.
Peace and amen to all that.
config issues, I find that it works fine for me. Working with the new
control center and setting up the email took a bit of digging in the FAQs
but once I understood the changes, in some ways I find them better.
I have WINXP, a large HD, and a lot of RAM so I don't have some of the
issues I read about here re: taking too much CPU. The problems many people
on this forum have seem to be related either to not yet having a grasp on
setting AVG7 up; related to process priority and CPU usage in task
manager.--often from people having setups other than XP, using Windows 98 or
other. Or they might use programs of alternative flavors. A lot say that
AVAST works better for them. It seems people with laptops often say that.
From these observations it seems that maybe AVG7 is not good for every
computer based on these variables, as maybe AVG6 was. I wonder if this is
some kind of refitting on the part of Grisoft in the same sense as with MS
pulling support for (what they consider to be) outdated OSs.
I was lucky(?) enough to come back in to computing recently with Windows at
a school, then XP in my own first computer and it has been relatively smooth
sailing. From reading Langa, etc. though, I am aware that many people still
like DOS, or have liitle use for upgrading hardware, etc. They ought to be
used to changes not working well retroactively by now but I appreciate that
they don't have to like it. I know a guy who recently chose to buy a used
computer that used DOS for some reason, over buying a new one..
A guy like me who used to have to input stacks of data cards in a reader at
NJ State College and wait up to several days for the printouts that came
from the computer at Rutgers with my Psych experiment results; then years
later took enough Data Processing courses to appreciate DOS as being the
hard way, for me; I like to celebrate the changes that upgrade the GUI the
most.
So before you say AVG7 sucks, or AVAST rules, or whatever, consider that
things change and will keep on upgrading and it is your choice about whether
to like it or leave it, but realize that as things change they need to be
looked at differently and won't always be consistent with retroactive ideas
and hardware. Most everything nowadays is instant and disposable anyway. The
energy it takes to object to something post after post could be used to see
where what you have fits and be happy there will always be something that
works if something else doesn't. You know what sucks?--if you happened to
drop that stack of cards on the way to the reader after punching in all the
data with one-finger typing, that's what.
Peace and amen to all that.