G
Guest
Hello,
I'm using Access 2003. I have a combobox whose row source is a query that
has 2 fields. The combobox is bound to the first field (or column, as access
describes it), and is displaying the second field in the picklist. The
records in my query are like this (double quotes used for clarity):
"I", "I-Some Text"
"II", "II-Some Text"
"III", "III-Some Text"
"", "No Number"
Keep in mind my combobox is bound to the first field. So if I pick "I-Some
Text" from the picklist, "I" is what is ultimately set in my database (form
is bound to a table). The last record in this query result set displays
correctly as "No Number" in my combobox's picklist, However, if I select "No
Number" from the picklist, it does not display it, but instantly sets it to
"".
I would think that the whole purpose of being able to set which field was
bound, and which field was displayed, would enable "No Number" to display in
the field, while "" is actually being set behing the scenes. But this
doesn't seem to be the case.
Any insights?
Thanks,
Scott
I'm using Access 2003. I have a combobox whose row source is a query that
has 2 fields. The combobox is bound to the first field (or column, as access
describes it), and is displaying the second field in the picklist. The
records in my query are like this (double quotes used for clarity):
"I", "I-Some Text"
"II", "II-Some Text"
"III", "III-Some Text"
"", "No Number"
Keep in mind my combobox is bound to the first field. So if I pick "I-Some
Text" from the picklist, "I" is what is ultimately set in my database (form
is bound to a table). The last record in this query result set displays
correctly as "No Number" in my combobox's picklist, However, if I select "No
Number" from the picklist, it does not display it, but instantly sets it to
"".
I would think that the whole purpose of being able to set which field was
bound, and which field was displayed, would enable "No Number" to display in
the field, while "" is actually being set behing the scenes. But this
doesn't seem to be the case.
Any insights?
Thanks,
Scott