P
Paul M
which is better coding performance wise?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
H
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
* "Paul M said:which is better coding performance wise?
----------------------------
for x as integer = 1 to 10000
'.......
next
----------------------------
or
----------------------------
Dim x as integer
for x = 1 to 100000
........
next
----------------------------
The same.
A
Armin Zingler
Paul M said:which is better coding performance wise?
----------------------------
for x as integer = 1 to 10000
'.......
next
----------------------------
or
----------------------------
Dim x as integer
for x = 1 to 100000
........
next
----------------------------
I still prefer the "old" (2nd) version because "go to definition" in the
context menu when you click on the word "Integer" does not work (yet). Well,
rarely used with Integer, but with other data types.
--
Armin
How to quote and why:
http://www.plig.net/nnq/nquote.html
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
C
Cor Ligthert
"Armin > I still prefer the "old" (2nd) version because "go to definition"
in the
latest index which cannot with the first.
For the rest I use the first one, just because it is less typing and in my
vision more compact to see.
Cor
in the
I use the second "old" when I needs to exit a for loop and want to have thecontext menu when you click on the word "Integer" does not work (yet). Well,
rarely used with Integer, but with other data types.
latest index which cannot with the first.
For the rest I use the first one, just because it is less typing and in my
vision more compact to see.
Cor
H
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
* "Cor Ligthert said:"Armin > I still prefer the "old" (2nd) version because "go to definition"
in the
I use the second "old" when I needs to exit a for loop and want to have the
latest index which cannot with the first.
That's a good point!