G
Guest
Hi,
I have a controversy with my colleague.
We are installing an HP cluster.
This cluster has a dual port network card embedded.
We bought an extra card for increasing f. tolerance.
He says:
"In case of damage of 1 port of the NIC embedded, the heartbeat traffic will
be send on the public network. The public network will be implemented by the
teaming between 1 port of the embedded card and the extra network card.
The private network will be implemented by the other port of the embedded
port."
I reply that in case of damage all traffic (public/private) will be relayed
through the SAME port! Microsoft do not support this,
right?(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;258750#appliesto)
Moreover, the embedded card is risky because the 2 port relies on it.
I suggest to by another card, but He says that isn't necessary.
What do You suggest?
Thanks
Tony
I have a controversy with my colleague.
We are installing an HP cluster.
This cluster has a dual port network card embedded.
We bought an extra card for increasing f. tolerance.
He says:
"In case of damage of 1 port of the NIC embedded, the heartbeat traffic will
be send on the public network. The public network will be implemented by the
teaming between 1 port of the embedded card and the extra network card.
The private network will be implemented by the other port of the embedded
port."
I reply that in case of damage all traffic (public/private) will be relayed
through the SAME port! Microsoft do not support this,
right?(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;258750#appliesto)
Moreover, the embedded card is risky because the 2 port relies on it.
I suggest to by another card, but He says that isn't necessary.
What do You suggest?
Thanks
Tony