H
Howard
This is on a home/test environment. One AD Win2K server with DHCP and
DNS (AD). One dual homed member server (also Win2K server ) running
RRAS NAT. This member server has a standalone DNS (primary public DNS
server). DNS and DHCP are disabled in NAT since I already have those
services through my other server. Everything works, all clients in
the domain can access the internet.
The problem is that a port scanner shows the following ports open:
53, 135, 139, 389, 445, 1002, 1046, etc...
Can MS NAT block all ports? I only need port 53 open (my public DNS)
and in the near future, ports 25 & 80. I know I can map static routes
based on ports, but can I close unwanted ones? Do I still need to
purchase a separate firewall to block all ports?
Previously, I was using a program called Winroute (similar to Wingate)
for internet sharing (also nat). Winroute closed all ports by
default. Can this be done with MS NAT?
BTW, I got rid of Winroute cause I'm studying for my MS exams and want
to get hands on experience with RRAS.
Thanks,
Howard
DNS (AD). One dual homed member server (also Win2K server ) running
RRAS NAT. This member server has a standalone DNS (primary public DNS
server). DNS and DHCP are disabled in NAT since I already have those
services through my other server. Everything works, all clients in
the domain can access the internet.
The problem is that a port scanner shows the following ports open:
53, 135, 139, 389, 445, 1002, 1046, etc...
Can MS NAT block all ports? I only need port 53 open (my public DNS)
and in the near future, ports 25 & 80. I know I can map static routes
based on ports, but can I close unwanted ones? Do I still need to
purchase a separate firewall to block all ports?
Previously, I was using a program called Winroute (similar to Wingate)
for internet sharing (also nat). Winroute closed all ports by
default. Can this be done with MS NAT?
BTW, I got rid of Winroute cause I'm studying for my MS exams and want
to get hands on experience with RRAS.
Thanks,
Howard