J
Jordan S.
REPOST from another group because of lack of response in that group. Sorry
if this is bad etiquette, just thinking I may have posted to the wrong NG to
begin with: so here goes:
I have a client that has an MS Access application that has outgrown MS
Access and it's time to migrate to something more substantial. I'm proposing
a .NET Windows Forms application.
The client is balking in part because they don't want to have to incorporate
my proposed .NET application into their desktop image. Strange, their
balking, because they *already* have deployed the .NET framework on their
desktop image.
So I don't have a lot of time to investigate, in detail, Click-once and/or
the Application Updator Block (from the patterns and practices group) - so
I'd just appreciate verification of my understanding (I'm not lazy - just
swamped right now!!! so thanks for any high-level guidance on this):
So, am I correct to claim or believe that:
1. Because they already have the .NET Framework installed on their client
image (XP Pro) that I don't need for them to install anything else in the
image - except perhaps a folder for my application and the application's
files.
2. If deployed with ClickOnce - we don't have to touch the client machines
At ALL or modify their desktop image (because we can send an e-mail to users
with a link that, when clicked triggers the complete installation.
3. Server-side requirements for ClickOnce are no more than a share that is
visible to all potential clients (with sufficient NTFS permissions to permit
reading from the share).
4. After initial deployment (via the e-mail thingie described above), the
application will update itself upon startup.
In other words - we literally don't need to ever touch the existing desktop
image if we go with ClickOnce (or Application Updator) and the app can be
deployed and updated on an ongoing basis automatically. yes?
Am I missing anything or just plain wrong about any of this?
Thanks!
if this is bad etiquette, just thinking I may have posted to the wrong NG to
begin with: so here goes:
I have a client that has an MS Access application that has outgrown MS
Access and it's time to migrate to something more substantial. I'm proposing
a .NET Windows Forms application.
The client is balking in part because they don't want to have to incorporate
my proposed .NET application into their desktop image. Strange, their
balking, because they *already* have deployed the .NET framework on their
desktop image.
So I don't have a lot of time to investigate, in detail, Click-once and/or
the Application Updator Block (from the patterns and practices group) - so
I'd just appreciate verification of my understanding (I'm not lazy - just
swamped right now!!! so thanks for any high-level guidance on this):
So, am I correct to claim or believe that:
1. Because they already have the .NET Framework installed on their client
image (XP Pro) that I don't need for them to install anything else in the
image - except perhaps a folder for my application and the application's
files.
2. If deployed with ClickOnce - we don't have to touch the client machines
At ALL or modify their desktop image (because we can send an e-mail to users
with a link that, when clicked triggers the complete installation.
3. Server-side requirements for ClickOnce are no more than a share that is
visible to all potential clients (with sufficient NTFS permissions to permit
reading from the share).
4. After initial deployment (via the e-mail thingie described above), the
application will update itself upon startup.
In other words - we literally don't need to ever touch the existing desktop
image if we go with ClickOnce (or Application Updator) and the app can be
deployed and updated on an ongoing basis automatically. yes?
Am I missing anything or just plain wrong about any of this?
Thanks!