C
cvt
As I did when I started on my BCI6 refills, I tested them again.
Unable to get hold of 'claimed' cli8 ink from resellers, I spent a few
hours arguing and getting transferred around, talking to inktec and
ausink, who claim to have cli8 inks, and after getting to someone with
some knoledge in Ausink, Canon Dye ink, C6, Black, is the same, and Canon
Colour dye inks, are C3, they made no change, and don't intend to, they
still beleive there ink matches or exceeds even the cli8 inks, which is
supposed to be much better than bci6, is it not?
When I origionally compared the aftermarket (although I get from
resellers, its ausink's ink) to BCI6, I found all of the inks except the
cyan to be better than the OEM under all abusive conditions.
The cyan got changed about 3 months after I ordered my first 500mL, About
when I reordered another 1L of colours was when the new inks came in.
I noticed no visible difference straight off, but was told the
formulation had changed.
There has been no changes in the ink since, as far as I am aware.
Now.
Having a new set of cartridges still never used from my i9900 (refilled
first set from day 1) I put them in..
Printed a bit to clear nozzles of AM ink.
Printed 2 pictures, and 2 copys of each.
I did the same with my ip6600D
I Now removed my new cartridges from the ip6600D, swapped chips to my
spent cartridge (as to not avoid the warranty incase of worst case
scenario).
Refilled them with C6 black and C3 Colours as I did with my BCI6 ones.
I printed full pages of junk to use half the ink in the ressy (more on
some of them) to garentee all oem ink spent.
I then printed the same as I did before.
One was colour spectrum, and fine colour lines, kind of similair to the
black test, black was the ISO test print they use with cameras (go look
at some dSLR reviews and you'll see it)
Was printed on canon's own high resolution paper (the polished one)
Having access to all sorts of wonderful UV gear at uni, a colour, and
black of all of them, got subjected to 12 hours of intense UV, with the
assistance of some humidity
The next step got subject to water in given spots.. even tho everyone
knows dye ink hates water, whats the harm in testing?
Last step, got thrown in the oven at just below 'tanning' point for a few
hours. (about 5)
After this I compared.
Colour:
None of the inks deteriated except red/magenta
CLI8 - Lost about 12 on M, 1 on C, 1 on Y, in regards to
magenta.
BCI6 - Lost about 11 on M, 0 on C, 1 on Y, in regards to red, 14 on M, 2
on C, 1 on Y in regards to magenta
C3 - Lost about 12 on M, 2 on C, 0 on Y, in regards to magenta
Black:
They all were identical, the scanner could not pick up even 1/255
difference on any of the 3 after testing several positions.
They all washed away into the identical green, with purple halo and
purple on the underside of the paper.
Resolution Difference:
Nothing, the i9900 naturally had the nicest looking print albeit with the
oversaturated red and green, as it does, otherwise resolution difference
was beyond the papers capability.
Colour difference compared:
The pM and pC both came up 1/255 different between the BCI6 and CLI8, the
aftermarket matched the cli8. Could be printer itself?
Considering the crudeness of this experiment..
I'm left wondering what improvement, if any, there really is in the
Chromalife ink?
As it seems to deterioate identical to both aftermarket and bci6 inks.
The improvement of the C3 ink is still obvious compared to the BCI6,
which was in my origional test years ago, the improvement remains much
the same, but the cli-8 does appear to be the same.
So the ink I get definately is not OEM ink, and may very well be made
here as they claim, is better than bci6, as good as cli8??, but no reason
to care, the difference is too small to be concerned about.
Unable to get hold of 'claimed' cli8 ink from resellers, I spent a few
hours arguing and getting transferred around, talking to inktec and
ausink, who claim to have cli8 inks, and after getting to someone with
some knoledge in Ausink, Canon Dye ink, C6, Black, is the same, and Canon
Colour dye inks, are C3, they made no change, and don't intend to, they
still beleive there ink matches or exceeds even the cli8 inks, which is
supposed to be much better than bci6, is it not?
When I origionally compared the aftermarket (although I get from
resellers, its ausink's ink) to BCI6, I found all of the inks except the
cyan to be better than the OEM under all abusive conditions.
The cyan got changed about 3 months after I ordered my first 500mL, About
when I reordered another 1L of colours was when the new inks came in.
I noticed no visible difference straight off, but was told the
formulation had changed.
There has been no changes in the ink since, as far as I am aware.
Now.
Having a new set of cartridges still never used from my i9900 (refilled
first set from day 1) I put them in..
Printed a bit to clear nozzles of AM ink.
Printed 2 pictures, and 2 copys of each.
I did the same with my ip6600D
I Now removed my new cartridges from the ip6600D, swapped chips to my
spent cartridge (as to not avoid the warranty incase of worst case
scenario).
Refilled them with C6 black and C3 Colours as I did with my BCI6 ones.
I printed full pages of junk to use half the ink in the ressy (more on
some of them) to garentee all oem ink spent.
I then printed the same as I did before.
One was colour spectrum, and fine colour lines, kind of similair to the
black test, black was the ISO test print they use with cameras (go look
at some dSLR reviews and you'll see it)
Was printed on canon's own high resolution paper (the polished one)
Having access to all sorts of wonderful UV gear at uni, a colour, and
black of all of them, got subjected to 12 hours of intense UV, with the
assistance of some humidity
The next step got subject to water in given spots.. even tho everyone
knows dye ink hates water, whats the harm in testing?
Last step, got thrown in the oven at just below 'tanning' point for a few
hours. (about 5)
After this I compared.
Colour:
None of the inks deteriated except red/magenta
CLI8 - Lost about 12 on M, 1 on C, 1 on Y, in regards to
magenta.
BCI6 - Lost about 11 on M, 0 on C, 1 on Y, in regards to red, 14 on M, 2
on C, 1 on Y in regards to magenta
C3 - Lost about 12 on M, 2 on C, 0 on Y, in regards to magenta
Black:
They all were identical, the scanner could not pick up even 1/255
difference on any of the 3 after testing several positions.
They all washed away into the identical green, with purple halo and
purple on the underside of the paper.
Resolution Difference:
Nothing, the i9900 naturally had the nicest looking print albeit with the
oversaturated red and green, as it does, otherwise resolution difference
was beyond the papers capability.
Colour difference compared:
The pM and pC both came up 1/255 different between the BCI6 and CLI8, the
aftermarket matched the cli8. Could be printer itself?
Considering the crudeness of this experiment..
I'm left wondering what improvement, if any, there really is in the
Chromalife ink?
As it seems to deterioate identical to both aftermarket and bci6 inks.
The improvement of the C3 ink is still obvious compared to the BCI6,
which was in my origional test years ago, the improvement remains much
the same, but the cli-8 does appear to be the same.
So the ink I get definately is not OEM ink, and may very well be made
here as they claim, is better than bci6, as good as cli8??, but no reason
to care, the difference is too small to be concerned about.