M
Stan said:Also, the entire reason Windows gets attacked incomparably more than
other OS's is PRECISELY due to its popularity.
If Linux were 90% of desktop OS market, it'd be Linux and not Windows
constantly under viral attacks.
So whoever is the leader, gets attacked.
In other words,
the moment Linux becomes more than a hobbyist OS (not current reality,
but theoretically - imagine), you'd see a myriad of security holes in
Alias' beloved OS; just because it's occupying a small market share you
don't see Linux security holes exposed!
Stan said:Also, the entire reason Windows gets attacked incomparably more than
other OS's is PRECISELY due to its popularity.
If Linux were 90% of desktop OS market, it'd be Linux and not Windows
constantly under viral attacks.
So whoever is the leader, gets attacked.
In other words,
the moment Linux becomes more than a hobbyist OS (not current reality,
but theoretically - imagine), you'd see a myriad of security holes in
Alias' beloved OS; just because it's occupying a small market share you
don't see Linux security holes exposed!
Funny thing about it is that it will only affect 50 users!Mugsy said:
Montague said:Funny thing about it is that it will only affect 50 users!
Nobody uses Linux on the desktop.
Funny thing about it is that it will only affect 50 users!
Nobody uses Linux on the desktop.
Gordon said:And your proof? I know of over 100 people who DO use Linux on the
desktop, so that shoots you down straight away as a liar, doesn't it?
DanS said:Well.....@ 1% usage, that's 10 million, so millions do use Linux.
The article stated.......
"By the time I wrote the exploit, there was a fix floating around, but it
didn't look like it was going to be going into any of the stable
releases," he said.
So I'm guessing it would be done as an update.
Wouldn't one be more famous if they were able to create a real Linux
virus that can live in the wild and does spread ? I mean really, up until
recently, an 8th grader could write a Windows virus, so what's the point
?
The biggest problem to the *home user* today is spyware and malware, not
some obscure overflow error that may or may not be able to allow full
control of a machine.
Gordon said:And your proof? I know of over 100 people who DO use Linux on the
desktop, so that shoots you down straight away as a liar, doesn't it?
Duck said:Don't you have some consulting to do?
Bet your "customers" are kids.
You don't have the IQ to even converse with adults.