G
george
I have just used the "new" CHKDSK on a Win XP machine for
the first time, running it from a command prompt and using
the "/r" switch. It seems to be inferior to Win 9x
ScanDisk (and Norton Disk Doctor, for that matter)in a
couple of ways.
Why does CHKDSK not offer the options that were available
from the "Advanced" button in ScanDisk?
Why does CHKDSK not report that there are *zero* bad
sectors found when that is (presumably, in this case) what
it found? Does it only report on the bad sectors category
when it actually finds some?
Where is a log file for the scan?
Thanks for any assistance.
George
the first time, running it from a command prompt and using
the "/r" switch. It seems to be inferior to Win 9x
ScanDisk (and Norton Disk Doctor, for that matter)in a
couple of ways.
Why does CHKDSK not offer the options that were available
from the "Advanced" button in ScanDisk?
Why does CHKDSK not report that there are *zero* bad
sectors found when that is (presumably, in this case) what
it found? Does it only report on the bad sectors category
when it actually finds some?
Where is a log file for the scan?
Thanks for any assistance.
George