Can't access Internet unless I turn off OneCare firewall after Vista upgrade

  • Thread starter Thread starter EJR
  • Start date Start date
E

EJR

I upgraded XP pro yesterday to Vista Ultimate. I had already upgraded
OneCare to 1.5. Since I upgraded I can't get to the internet unless I turn
the OneCare firewall off. If I turn the Windows firewall on I can still get
to the internet.

I read another post that said to add Ports 6 and 17 to the exception list in
OneCare. I did this and I now can access the internet but I also read that
turning on these ports is the same as turning off the OneCare firewall.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.
 
EJR said:
I upgraded XP pro yesterday to Vista Ultimate. I had already upgraded
OneCare to 1.5. Since I upgraded I can't get to the internet unless I turn
the OneCare firewall off. If I turn the Windows firewall on I can still get
to the internet.

I read another post that said to add Ports 6 and 17 to the exception list in
OneCare. I did this and I now can access the internet but I also read that
turning on these ports is the same as turning off the OneCare firewall.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.
Click to expand...
The OneCare team is investigating the cause of this problem that has affected
some users of 1.5 that upgraded from XP to Vista with 1.5 in place. The
workaround at this time is to turn off the OneCare firewall and enable the Vista
firewall. When the cause and solution is found, either a OneCare update will be
pushed or instructions for how to resolve will be provided via support and on
the OneCare forums. You are correct, if you open up protocols 6 and 17
bidirectionally you are indeed allowing most Internet traffic through the
firewall, effectively rendering the firewall useless, while OneCare will happily
report that you are protected and will be in a green status. If an update is
pushed to resolve the problem, you will remain unprotected until you manually
remove the rules you added for those protocols.
-steve
 
Just curious. How does ports 6 and 17 allow most Internet traffic through
your system? How does Windows respond to traffic on those ports?

Dale
 
Dale said:
Just curious. How does ports 6 and 17 allow most Internet traffic through
your system? How does Windows respond to traffic on those ports?

Dale
Click to expand...
Not "ports" - "protocols."
(6 for TCP, 17 for UDP, 1 for ICMP, and so on)
If you create a rule to unconditionally allow bidirectional traffic for
protocols 6 and 17, you're apparently allowing all TCP and UDP traffic in an out
without regard for source.
-steve
 
What's the source of the protocol numbers 1, 6, 17, etc? While I haven't
done network admin for a while, I'm not completely unknowledgeable in the
subject but I have never come across that.

Dale
 
Dale said:
What's the source of the protocol numbers 1, 6, 17, etc? While I haven't
done network admin for a while, I'm not completely unknowledgeable in the
subject but I have never come across that.

Dale
Click to expand...
I did a search last night on Live Search and got that snip from a Cisco page.
http://www-europe.cisco.com/en/US/p...ommand_reference_chapter09186a00800ec9e6.html

The full quote is from the entry for - author_service:

"The services which require authorization. Use any, ftp, http, telnet, or
protocol/port. Use any to provide authorization for all TCP services. To provide
authorization for UDP services, use the protocol/port form.

Services not specified are authorized implicitly. Services specified in the aaa
authentication command do not affect the services which require authorization.

For protocol/port:

protocol—the protocol (6 for TCP, 17 for UDP, 1 for ICMP, and so on).
port—the TCP or UDP destination port, or port range. The port can also be the
ICMP type; that is, 8 for ICMP echo or ping. A port value of 0 (zero) means all
ports. Port ranges only applies to the TCP and UDP protocols, not to ICMP. For
protocols other than TCP, UDP, and ICMP the port is not applicable and should
not be used. An example port specification follows.
aaa authorization include udp/53-1024 inside 0 0 0 0

This example enables authorization for DNS lookups to the inside interface for
all clients, and authorizes access to any other services that have ports in the
range of 53 to 1024.

Note Specifying a port range may produce unexpected results at the authorization
server. PIX Firewall sends the port range to the server as a string with the
expectation that the server will parse it out into specific ports. Not all
servers do this. In addition, you may want users to be authorized on specific
services, which will not occur if a range is accepted."

-steve
 
Back
Top