Stick Stickus wrote:
"measekite"
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Taliesyn wrote:
measekite wrote:
Now since that is the case with all of the inkjet printers one should not use an inkjet. So get a BW Laser and take your photos to a Lab.
Man, that's about the lamest suggestion I've ever read in any newsgroup! There is always an alternative. I refill my printer's tiny cartridges with non-OEM ink.
Born a fool and die a fool
I have 6 rotating cartridge sets on hand, it cost's me peanuts
Some people do not have peanuts and pay in cash
and I can print entire phone books if I had to.
Thats about the quality non OEM inks produce until they clog your heads.
Untrue! An independant review of inkjet cartridges has shown that of the OEM's Canon is the worst ink. It showed that refilling is the way to go. See
http://www.trustedreviews.com/printers/review/2007/04/21/The-Inkjet-Investigation/p1
I have read reviews from trusted reviews on many cameras and came to the conclusion that their reviews cannot be trusted after reading reviews from many other sites on the same cameras.
This should supply ALL the information you need to make a sound judgement unlike measekite who has no idea and never has.
Pop one set of cartridges out, pop another set in. No one has to quit his/her inkjet because OEM ink costs too much. Fortunately we live in a free market, there is always an alternative to the high cost of manufacturer's inks. If one can't suggest a reasonable alternative to a problem then you shouldn't pretend to be offering help! Capisce? -Taliesyn
[email protected] wrote:
Just be wary before buying this printer that the ink is very expensive and comes in small cartridges. They use a computer chip on the cartridge so buying aftermarket ones is a pain. Great device buy ongoing costs are very large.