Helmut Meukel said:
Then there seems to be some posters banned from MS news.
I doubt that very much.
The MSNews server might reject articles posted from some IP addresses,
presumably based on well-known blacklist sites. (I object to the
blacklists. In the past, "good" addresses have found their way onto
blacklists; e.g. some of the many servers used by AOL.)
However, I expect that articles posted from blacklisted IP addresses are
never accepted by the MSNews server; I expect the TCP connection is rejected
immediately. Ergo, they could never appear on sites that mirror the MS
newsgroups, like Google Groups.
On the contrary, since Austin's articles, posted to the MSNews server, do
appear in Google Groups, the MSNews did accept those articles initially.
microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion, "Executables", Terry Austin.
Aka "Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy".
Although I cannot spoof the IP address of Austin's news client, I did
successfully post an article spoofing everything else, including Austin's
"From" line. The article was posted successfully, and it survived on the
MSNews server. Ergo, Austin is not "banned from MS news".
The news server has filters and some totally inoffensive words
cause posts to be blocked.
All of Austin's postings include the mail header record "X-Suck-My-Dick:
Suck.My.Dick", replacing periods with spaces. It is the phrase
"suck.my.dick", replacing periods with spaces, that causes the article to be
removed from the MSNews server.
Interestingly some - not all - of those posts show up in Google.
It depends on when Google (actually Giganews) pulls articles from the MSNews
server.
The MSNews server does not block articles immediately. Instead, there
appears to be a process that runs either periodically or after an article is
accepted. The process scrubs a newsgroup or newsgroups of articles with
"offensive" strings. Sometimes, the process is delayed, presumably due to
the load on the MSNews server. If the delay is long enough -- I have
experienced delays of more than 5 minutes -- other news servers might have
time coincidentally to pull the article before it is removed from the MSNews
server.
In this case, the "offensive" string is understandable, although I object to
censorship of any kind. (Except for spam, ideally. But in practice, spam
cannot be avoided without innocent casualties.)
However, I have also noted in the Excel newsgroups that articles with the
strings "on o" and "xy z", without spaces, are removed from the MSNews
server, presumably due to an unintentionally overly-aggressive filter
configuration.
Some MVPs have forwarded these observations to people within MS. But I
would not hold my breath for a correction, at least for the latter two
examples.
----- original message -----