Rickkins said:
Frankly, I know damn well it does not...but I got a very stubborn friend
who swears it does...regardless of what I tell him.
He'll be here tomorrow....so I want him to read this.
Thanks
Not damned likely. RAM isn't used for downloads, hard drive space is. For
RAM to speed up download speeds:
First, you'd have to have a download speed faster than typical IDE bus
transfer speed, so that system RAM is filled as a temporary buffer. (SATA
interface is potentially faster, but then you'd need an even FASTER download
speed to fill up system RAM)
So let's do the math, assuming ATA100 IDE bus speed:
The computer can store downloaded data at up to 100MB/second on a ATA100
hard drive*. A 5M cable modem can download at about 500KB/second, or about
1/2MB/second. Or in other words, a rather slow IDE hard drive can store
data 200 times faster than a rather fast cable modem can download it. So,
the hard drive's own RAM buffer never gets filled, and thus the system RAM
is not a factor in download speed at all.
HOWEVER, Downloads can be -initiated- faster on a system that is performing
as well as possible. Ample system RAM is one part of that equation. So if
you are running artificial download speed tests, a system with sufficient
RAM quantity might -look- to be downloading faster than a system that is
starved for RAM. That is the only circumstance where more RAM might appear
to help download speeds. But the bigger the file downloaded, the smaller
the apparent download speed difference, until there will be NO difference
showing eventually. In other words, a download that completes in a few
seconds might have a higher KB/second number on a machine with sufficient
RAM. But a download that takes an hour or longer will have the same
KB/second number on the machine, regardless of how much system RAM that
machine has (as long as the OS will boot)
*Actual sustained data rate is probably 1/10th this speed, but still
SIGNIFICANTLY faster than even the fastest cable modems can download