There are SLR cameras (a camera with a fixed lens) and DSLR cameras (a
camera that can accept different lenses).
Big differences between SLR and DSLR
DSLR are much faster for shooting than SLR, but they are bulky and you need
at least two lenses to cover about the same range (wide angle-telephoto)
that a good SLR will cover with a fixed lens.
If you like Canon, two recent cameras are the PowerShot A620 and the
PowerShot S80. Both very good. Both are SLR cameras. You can add attachments
to the A620 for wider angle and higher telephoto while the S80 is a little
camera that you can always have in your coat pocket.
The last (about a year ago) reasonably priced DSLR camera from Canon is the
Rebel XT or 350XT. Also very good but you can't keep such in your coat
pocket.
You can read the reviews on these cameras from here:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/diginews.html
Another site for reviews on these cameras is:
http://www.dpreview.com/
Here you can also read the endless debate about SLR vs DSLR cameras. My
bottom line is yes DSLR are better because faster focus, faster continuous
shooting, better in low light situations etc. etc. if you want to lug them
along and change lens as appropriate. To hell with this. I would rather have
a camera that I can easily carry with me. Take your pick as appropriate!
walt said:
Is there a difference between a SLR and DOS camera? I am looking to buy a new
digital camera. I like Canon want something that will take continious
shots.