Call of Duty Demo!

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Hall
  • Start date Start date
J

John Hall

If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way it
should be played.

JK
 
Plays badass, on my 9700np

-
We Live For The One We Die For The One stood up at show-n-tell, in
(e-mail address removed), and said:
 
If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way it
should be played.
Click to expand...



Hi,

I made a similar post myself. I was really impressed with the demo. It was
the first bit of proper FPS-first person gaming I done since I built my new
AMD rig using a Sapphire Atlantis 9800, really was impressed!

I get the feeling that this game could be kickass in a LAN set-up if you and
your mates could play co-op vs the computer (Germans).

Anyway I been out the FPS gaming loop for 3 years or so. Maybe I am too
easily impressed but I give my thumbs up for the ATI cards, I have been a
long term nVidia user. . .

--
Wayne ][

Barton (AQXEA) XP2500+ @ 2.2GHz (10x220) - 1.75vCore
CoolerMaster Aero 7 Lite - 3,200rpm
ABIT NF7-S (v2.0 - BIOS#14)
512MB Dual TwiSTER PC3500 @ DDR440 (8,3,3,2.0 - 2.8v)
Sapphire Atlantis 9800 - 3.3ns Samsung
240GB (2x120GB) WD-SE SATA RAID-0 (16k Stripe)
Antec SX630II Mini-Tower Case Inc 300w PSU
WinXP-PRO-SP1
Cat 3.7 - DX9.0b
 
If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way it
should be played.
Click to expand...
Except it uses the Quake 3 engine, so it runs smoothly on practically
anything.
 
I tried it. My system is a P4 at 3.4 Mhz with 512 Mb PC3700 and a 9800 Pro
on a 172T LCD monitor. Game play is good, not anything better than MOAA,
but better than BF-1942 for single play. I found it to be a little jerky
with unexplained lags/pauses in some segments. Opponents sometimes seemed
to materialize from nowhere. I enjoyed it but it gave me a headache after
about 30 minutes. Ghost Recon is still the best single player FPS out
there, and CS is the undisputed champion if you want to test your skill on
line.
 
Frank Weston said:
I tried it. My system is a P4 at 3.4 Mhz with 512 Mb PC3700 and a 9800 Pro
on a 172T LCD monitor. Game play is good, not anything better than MOAA,
but better than BF-1942 for single play. I found it to be a little jerky
with unexplained lags/pauses in some segments. Opponents sometimes seemed
to materialize from nowhere. I enjoyed it but it gave me a headache after
about 30 minutes. Ghost Recon is still the best single player FPS out
there, and CS is the undisputed champion if you want to test your skill on
line.
Click to expand...

???
Gameplay is good, much improved over MOHAA. No jerkyness or lag at any time.
Opponents AI very good. Demo not that long though. Done in about 30 minutes.

Martin.
Barton XP3200+, 9700pro, 512 mb RAM.
 
MKH1 said:
???
Gameplay is good, much improved over MOHAA. No jerkyness or lag at any time.
Opponents AI very good. Demo not that long though. Done in about 30 minutes.

Martin.
Barton XP3200+, 9700pro, 512 mb RAM.
Click to expand...

Maybe that's my trouble. It only took me about 7 minutes to get through the
demo. I must have been moving too fast for the AI. Compared to human
opponents, all AI appears slow and stupid....I've been playing way to much
CS.
 
I think you should say "look just as good". The framerate will obviously be
slower, all other things equal.

Mike
 
Been playing it for awhile.. when it came out i only had the 7500 aiw.....played excellent with medium/high settings.... try this
at the end when he talking to you (giving the speech) gun down all the GI's before they get there and let him give the speech to a
bunch of dead guys.....i know i know but after 60 plays you get bored.
 
what is 'sync every frame' in the settings...it worked wonders for the 7500 aiw while playing...
 
JAD said:
what is 'sync every frame' in the settings...it worked wonders for the
Click to expand...
7500 aiw while playing...

That just means turn on vertical sync so that one frame is rendered per
screen refresh which avoids tearing of the image, but limits your frame rate
to the refresh rate. I always have vsync on because I play a lot of flight
sims and if I have it off I see horrible tearing in the cockpit graphics.
 
hmm i questioned that as, when i turn off vsync in display properties, go in the game, check sync every frame. alt tab out check
display props again and vsync is not enabled....thats why i asked that question in another post "which is more influencial', as I
see display properties settings to be NOT overwritten when set? application preferences unchecked or checked make a BIG difference?
 
hmm i questioned that as, when i turn off vsync in display properties, go in the game, check sync every frame. alt tab out check
display props again and vsync is not enabled....thats why i asked that question in another post "which is more influencial', as I
see display properties settings to be NOT overwritten when set? application preferences unchecked or checked make a BIG difference?
Click to expand...

Maybe you need to reboot for them to take effect. I just set mine to
always on and leave it. I can easily tell if it's on or not so know it
is working.
 
Back
Top