M
Mark
Hi all,
I still do most of my development at home using Access97. At work, I convert
the FE to the default 2000 format on a computer running Access 2002(or maybe
it's 2003, I'm not sure which). I can then distribute that converted FE to
either Access 2002/2003 and Access 2007 computers and everything works fine.
Someone showed up with Access 2010 and the Calendar Control that I use
(MSCAL.Calendar.7 on the Access97 computer) produces a "cannot open object"
(or similar) error message when I try to open the form that contains that
control. I've not run into other problems on the 2010 computer (but,
admittedly haven't checked everything out). References appear OK.
Would it make a difference, do you think, if I converted from 97 to
2002/2003, instead of 2000, and then ran the FE under 2010? I haven't had a
chance to try that yet, but thought someone might already know what needs to
be done (other than upgrading my Access at home <g>).
Thanks for any leads.
Mark
I still do most of my development at home using Access97. At work, I convert
the FE to the default 2000 format on a computer running Access 2002(or maybe
it's 2003, I'm not sure which). I can then distribute that converted FE to
either Access 2002/2003 and Access 2007 computers and everything works fine.
Someone showed up with Access 2010 and the Calendar Control that I use
(MSCAL.Calendar.7 on the Access97 computer) produces a "cannot open object"
(or similar) error message when I try to open the form that contains that
control. I've not run into other problems on the 2010 computer (but,
admittedly haven't checked everything out). References appear OK.
Would it make a difference, do you think, if I converted from 97 to
2002/2003, instead of 2000, and then ran the FE under 2010? I haven't had a
chance to try that yet, but thought someone might already know what needs to
be done (other than upgrading my Access at home <g>).
Thanks for any leads.
Mark