G
GTS
Hi I thought the max you could use on ATA133 was 18", but have seen several
24" ones around - are these OK to use?
TIA
24" ones around - are these OK to use?
TIA
GTS said:Hi I thought the max you could use on ATA133 was 18", but have seen several
24" ones around - are these OK to use?
Will Dormann said:Avoid cables beyond 18" if at all possible.
Since they're beyond spec. you may experience decreased performance or
other troubles.
-WD
Will Dormann said:Avoid cables beyond 18" if at all possible.
Since they're beyond spec. you may experience decreased performance or
other troubles.
GTS said:Hi I thought the max you could use on ATA133 was 18",
but have seen several 24" ones around - are these OK to use?
Timothy Daniels said:Yes, they *are* contrary to ATA specifications, but lots
of people use 'em without problems - including me, and that
is with ATA/133 hard drives. They're frequently found in
the "round cable" form and used by guys who have lots of HDs
in a large tower case and/or who want to avoid restriction
of the air flow - which can happen with flat cables. I prefer
the type with an aluminum braid around them on the theory
that the aluminum braid acts to help shield the data wires.
If they introduce bit errors, I haven't noticed any.
do_not_spam_me said:I don't because in many of those cables the braid isn't grounded, as
it should be, so it can act as an antenna (receiver and transmitter)
rather than a shield.
Twisted-pair wires are much better, and many round cables are
made with them.
How have you tested? Windows will slow down or turn off
DMA if it encounters HD errors, and throughput isn't a good
measure because drives can't sustain transfers much faster than
50 MB/s.
do_not_spam_me said:In practice it almost always works, but I'd rather have a cable that
long to be made up of twisted pairs similar to those found in LAN and
SCSI cables. Twisted-pair cable easily supports 36" ATA100 (I didn't
have an ATA133 controller or drive) and seemed to work fine even over
60".
I don't know of any reason why an IDE cable over 18" would
be needed for a 3.5" HD, and if I had to use drives in 5.25" bays
I'd rather get a deeper case that allows them to sit in front of the
motherboard rather than above it.
Timothy Daniels said:"do_not_spam_me" wrote:
Some people are stuck with what they already have in
the way of case and motherboard.
Some people use a PCI ATA controller card that places
the controller connectors farther away from the drives
than the motherboard's connectors.
In *none* of the "round" cables is the braid grounded.
But the braid still acts as a shield at high radio frequencies.
Even with shielded twisted-pair LAN cable, there is debate
Andy Lee said:Not true I have a round cable at home with a ground wire
from the braid which attaches to the MB mounting screw
near the ATA sockets
I cant remember the make off the top of my head but it is
black and very well made with a foil cover over the ends
of the wire where they transition from the round section to
the actual connectors.
How many wires are there which enter the connector?
That ground wire connected to a mounting screw sounds
inconvenient. I wonder why the manufacturer didn't use
the ground in the connector itself - the one that grounds
the 40 ground wires. There *are* 40 white ground wires,
right? Who sold it to you?
*TimDaniels*
Andy Lee said:There are 40 ground wires. It is recognised by the system
as a 80 wire cable at least it lets UDMA 5 devices run as
such. The ground wire is inconvienient only if you connect/
disconnect cables on a regular basis, something I'm not
inclined to do. If I change a drive I usually leave the MB
connector attached and only disconnect the drive end.
I brought the cable from a local supplier, when I get home
at the end of the week I will take looksee and let you know
who made it. I was attracted to the cable because it is so
much better made than a lot of the round cables I have
seen/brought in the past.
Having said that I have only had problems with one of these
which was very picky about how it was routed with out
causing drive connection issues.
All my HD's are now serial ATA and the connectors/cables
for that are so much easier to manage and my only real want
from them now is the provision of a shorter cable as the
SATA ports on my MB are very close to the back end of
the DRives and the standard cables are probably twice as
long as they need to be.
It will be interesting to see the brand name. From my
personal observation from looking at web photos, from
seeing them in the stores, and from actually calling some
of the distributors, it seems that there are only about
three manufacturers - all of them in Asia - despite there
being many brand names.
When I finally got my hands on a physical SATA cable,
I was surprised by how rigid it was in side-to-side bending
(as opposed to forward-and-back). Does that feature
give you any routing problems? Maybe the cables are
long to accomodate that stiffness.
*TimDaniels*
Andy Lee said:Right I've had a look and they are made by Antech. Presumably
the same Antech who make cases. They have black moulded
rubber boots at each transition to plug from cable with as I said
a foil sheathing over the wires. The main cable has a woven nylon
sheathing not like most of the cables which use a rubber tube.
This woven stuff is the same as Enermax use on their power
supply low voltage cables
I've seen those cables. They might be made here as one of
the places said, when I called them, that they could make
them to any length that I want. I passed on it since I didn't
know they had foil shielding and they were... uh... ugleeee.
*TimDaniels*