J
JohnrC
I'm trying desperately to find an alternative and stop using Norton AV.
I've been trying eTrust CA Antivirus and for the most part it seems
okay. Except:
- After all scheduled system scans, the log lists at least 40 files
with "- scan failed" beside them. Examples are:
C:\Documents and Settings\John Ciccone\Local
Settings\Temp\Perflib_Perfdata_28c.dat - scan failed.
or
C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\NTUSER.DAT - scan failed.
I've asked Tech Support a few times and though the've responded, I'm
afraid I don't understand their answer. They say it can't scan files in
use, and "If it is limited to some set of files, than you can ignore
the message."
I just don't understand the concept of ignoring my antivirus when it
can't scan a file. How would I know that it's not a new virus that
can't be scanned?
Secondly, in the middle of downloading email into Outlook Express, EZ
AV crashed and went away after displaying an error dlg of some kind...
but the email kept downloading! Sounds kind of dangerous to me.
Maybe Norton had the same troubles but hid them better. Anyone else
experience the same?
TIA for any input.
I've been trying eTrust CA Antivirus and for the most part it seems
okay. Except:
- After all scheduled system scans, the log lists at least 40 files
with "- scan failed" beside them. Examples are:
C:\Documents and Settings\John Ciccone\Local
Settings\Temp\Perflib_Perfdata_28c.dat - scan failed.
or
C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\NTUSER.DAT - scan failed.
I've asked Tech Support a few times and though the've responded, I'm
afraid I don't understand their answer. They say it can't scan files in
use, and "If it is limited to some set of files, than you can ignore
the message."
I just don't understand the concept of ignoring my antivirus when it
can't scan a file. How would I know that it's not a new virus that
can't be scanned?
Secondly, in the middle of downloading email into Outlook Express, EZ
AV crashed and went away after displaying an error dlg of some kind...
but the email kept downloading! Sounds kind of dangerous to me.
Maybe Norton had the same troubles but hid them better. Anyone else
experience the same?
TIA for any input.