C# Rocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter C# Learner
  • Start date Start date
C

C# Learner

I can create an app, with the following structure of namespaces and
classes:

MyApp.UI.MainForm, MyApp.UI.SecondayForm
MyApp.Functionality.SomeClass, MyApp.Functionality.SomeOtherClass

How cool is that?
 
C# Learner said:
I can create an app, with the following structure of namespaces and
classes:

MyApp.UI.MainForm, MyApp.UI.SecondayForm
MyApp.Functionality.SomeClass, MyApp.Functionality.SomeOtherClass

How cool is that?
Click to expand...

Very. :)

Joe
 
I can create an app, with the following structure of namespaces and
classes:

MyApp.UI.MainForm, MyApp.UI.SecondayForm
MyApp.Functionality.SomeClass, MyApp.Functionality.SomeOtherClass

How cool is that?
Click to expand...

it gets even cooler when MyApp.UI.MainForm & .UI.SecondaryForm &
MyApp.Functionalaty.SharedShit are in diffrent assemblys
 
C# Learner said:
I can create an app, with the following structure of namespaces and
classes:

MyApp.UI.MainForm, MyApp.UI.SecondayForm
MyApp.Functionality.SomeClass, MyApp.Functionality.SomeOtherClass

How cool is that?
Click to expand...

shouldn't that be .NET rocks?
 
Da~One said:
shouldn't that be .NET rocks?
Click to expand...

This ability is (mostly) an attribute of the language, not the
framework. I can see your point though - I'd imagine one can do
something similar in VB.NET.

Sure, I like the framework, but I make a point of saying that *C#*
rocks as it's rare to find such a decent language. This is the kind
of language I've been searching for, for years!

I guess I take good frameworks for granted.
 
Namespaces are fundamental to the framework and hence, all .net languages.
So one lang does not get the credit.
 
William Stacey said:
Namespaces are fundamental to the framework and hence, all .net languages.
So one lang does not get the credit.
Click to expand...

True, but the language which has a decent implementation of namespaces
*and* C-like syntax gets credit from me.

:-)
 
Back
Top