M
Martin Schmid
Is it possible to run C# Dot Net applications on IIS4/NT4? What are the
minimum OS requirements? Thanks for any links for information!
minimum OS requirements? Thanks for any links for information!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
J
Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
Martin Schmid said:Is it possible to run C# Dot Net applications on IIS4/NT4?
You can certainly run .NET on NT4 (but needs service pack 6a). I don't
know whether or not ASP.NET will run on IIS4 though.
What are the
minimum OS requirements? Thanks for any links for information!
See
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=262D25E3-F589-
4842-8157-034D1E7CF3A3&displaylang=en
also known as
http://tinyurl.com/95zt
C
Cybertof
In the same idea, what are the benefits in running ASP.NET on a Windows
2003 rather than on a Windows 2000 (with .net framework installed) ?
Any things regarding the integration of the framework with IIS that you
can do within Win2003 IIS and not in Win2000 IIS ?
Cybertof.
2003 rather than on a Windows 2000 (with .net framework installed) ?
Any things regarding the integration of the framework with IIS that you
can do within Win2003 IIS and not in Win2000 IIS ?
Cybertof.
N
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
Cybertof,
The benefits of IIS on 2003 over 2000 are not related to ASP.NET, but
you are provided with improved reliability. Before, on 2000 (IIS 5 I
believe), the IIS service handled the incoming requests. If your
application caused a fault for some reason, then the service would be
brought down. Now, the request handling mechanism (and much of the other
logic that is common to all applications) is handled in a kernel-level
driver. This way, your application can't bring down the site (although your
specific processing won't occur). This allows IIS to try and re-start the
application in the case of a fault, in order to provide a more seamless
experience in the event of a failure.
Hope this helps.
The benefits of IIS on 2003 over 2000 are not related to ASP.NET, but
you are provided with improved reliability. Before, on 2000 (IIS 5 I
believe), the IIS service handled the incoming requests. If your
application caused a fault for some reason, then the service would be
brought down. Now, the request handling mechanism (and much of the other
logic that is common to all applications) is handled in a kernel-level
driver. This way, your application can't bring down the site (although your
specific processing won't occur). This allows IIS to try and re-start the
application in the case of a fault, in order to provide a more seamless
experience in the event of a failure.
Hope this helps.
S
Stephen Russell
IIS 6 vs IIS5 is the primary benefit. Secondly Server2003 is much more
secure.
Stephen Russell
S.R. & Associates
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"I choose a block of marble and chop off whatever I don't need."
- Francois-Auguste Rodin (1840-1917), when asked how he managed to make his
remarkable statues
secure.
Stephen Russell
S.R. & Associates
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"I choose a block of marble and chop off whatever I don't need."
- Francois-Auguste Rodin (1840-1917), when asked how he managed to make his
remarkable statues
A
Arild Bakken
Cybertof said:In the same idea, what are the benefits in running ASP.NET on a Windows
2003 rather than on a Windows 2000 (with .net framework installed) ?
Any things regarding the integration of the framework with IIS that you
can do within Win2003 IIS and not in Win2000 IIS ?
Cybertof.
Running ASP.NET on Win2003 let's you isolate the websites completely, while
on Win2000 it is always possible for any ASP.NET application to read
configuration information and assembly resources from the other sites on the
same server.
Arild