John,
I appreciate your patience... I really do. I want to be a programmer.
Most stuff I've learned in the past couple of weeks, I've learned from the
internet and Access Help. This is just killing me....
The "parent" table is for tax ideas...
IdeaID
Idea Description
Category
etc..
the "child" table will represent the amount of reserve set aside by quarter
ReserveID
(however I need to set up the form for the quarters by year)
etc...
How are these two tables related - if at all? If it's truly a child
table, then there should be a "foreign key" linking the parent table
to the child table; is that IdeaID? Are these tax ideas for a client,
or just for yourself? What are the CONTENTS!! of the child table?
There will be two views:
Next year by quarter on the form itself
Next year plus 4 (5 year strategic plan) in a subform
DON'T confuse data STORAGE with data PRESENTATION.
Data should be stored *logically* based on the relationships between
the information in the tables.
If the "next year" and the "next four years" are the same *kind* of
information, then they should all be in one Table. They may or may not
be presented on a form and a subform, vs. one contiuous form - the
form/subform certainly makes your life a lot more complicated.
The year end calculations will be done on the form and on the reports.
Good. That's the right place.
Then of course (something on my wish list), if you make a change in Q3 of
2007, the following quarters will change but the previous ones keep the old
number. When a change is made I want to create a button for the date and the
reason for the change. This can probably be an autonum.
"This" can be an autonum? WHat? The button? the date? the reason? No,
*none* of these can be autonumbers. I suspect you may be using the
term "autonum" differently than Access does. An Autonum is just a Long
Integer which increments; if you delete a record, or even hit <Esc> in
the course of entering the record, that number will be used up
forever, leaving a gap. Autonumber are JUST 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14,
.... on and on until you quit entering records. They have no meaning.
If the value (you STILL haven't said what "the value" represents,
other than that it has something which I don't understand to do with
taxes) in a given quarter depends on what the value was in some
previous quarter, then your table is still not properly normalized. A
field value should depend on the Primary Key (year and quarter??) of
that record, and on *nothing else*.
We're still not fully understanding one another I fear, but I'm game
to keep trying!
John W. Vinson[MVP]