"kony" picked:
Timothy Daniels said:
It's usually EMI pickup that's a problem on data cables
rather than suppression.
With eSATA cables the problem is also with EMI *emission*.
One reason is the very high frequency clock rate - when the bits
go serially, the clock rate also has to be much higher than if they
are transmitted in parallel. Also, the eSATA cable can be up to
2 meters long and may be external to the case. These two
features could make an external SATA cable a reasonably good
transmitting antenna for electromagnetic interference (EMI).
Here is a white paper about External SATA:
http://www.sata-io.org/docs/External SATA WP 11-09.pdf
Here are a couple quotes regarding the new eSATA cable itself:
:
"In addition to the mechanical aspects of the cable and connector,
several electrical issues were addressed to ensure that the external
connected drive meets regulatory requirements for electrostatic
discharge (ESD) and electromagnetic interference (EMI) emissions
and susceptibility."
"The ground paths provided will help to minimize any EMI emissions
from the external drive, but additional steps were taken to modify the
cable by adding an extra layer of shielding surrounding both of the
differential signal pairs in the cable. In a standard internal cable,
each pair is shielded individually. This shielding remains in the
external cable, but an additional over wrap is also provided."
*TimDaniels*