This is getting ridiculous! I'm putting my responses inline and I hope you
will then be satisfied.
--
Ron Cohen
Bill said:
Yes I did...see below.
What you've said seems to be an oxymoron.
That isn't an oxymoron. I clearly stated that the monitor will not reset to
full when a replacement or refilled cartridge is installed and that it isn't
a problem - but if someone does want to reset the monitor to reflect the
status of the newly installed cartridge it can be done. All a user would be
doing is tricking the printer into thinking it was out of ink so that the
status monitor would reset to full when the refilled cartridge in put in.
How can you reset something that hasn't yet been triggered?
If the ink tank is replaced before the reservoir is empty, hence not
triggering a low ink warning, then there is nothing to reset - the
monitor continues to show the tanks as being "full".
Conversely, if the reservoir in the tank runs empty, triggering a low
ink warning, replacing or refilling it will reset the status monitor to
show a full ink tank.
I think this is where you may be confused. While the status monitor doesn't
actually show the exact amount of ink used, the display can indicate
partially full after some amount of printing - although it is an inaccurate
reading. On some Canon models such as the s820 the display drops in
increments, whereas on others like the i850 it seems to hold on to the full
reading much longer and then drops suddenly. The display will not reset to
full unless the low ink warning has appeared. Installing a full cartridge
will still result in a display of partially empty. As I said earlier, this
isn't a problem since the only real concern is when the low warning comes on
which means put more ink in now or burn out a printhead. If you are
installing new or refilled cartridges when the the low warning appears, then
this whole discussion is pointless. However, lots of users who refill
replace all the tanks at one time. Some of them want the monitor to be reset
although I see no reason in doing so. But that's the nice part about living
in the USA or Canada. People are free to make their own decisions.
I completely agree with that...
But I'm asking specifically WHY a user would want or need to "force a
reset" of something that has not yet occured...since the monitor has not
yet been triggered to show a low ink warning?
How am I supposed to know? This discussion isn't about when a low ink
warning has popped up. It's about a partially empty indication when a refill
is installed but without a low ink warning. If the low ink warning has
appeared, then reinstalling a new or refilled tank will reset the monitor to
full. Hint: next time you refill, only put in about 1/3 the amount of ink
needed to fill the reservoir. If you do so, the indicator will still show
full, not 2/3 empty.
For example, I always run low on yellow ink before cyan or magenta, and
replacing or refilling the tank resets the monitor. However, the other
two have never given a low warning and have consistently shown as full
all the time, even though I've replaced or refilled them several times.
Were they low enough to have triggered a warning? If so, you may have a
problem with the light sensor.
Are you suggesting there is some sort of page counter in the Canon
printers that we're not aware of that will affect printing?
I don't know of any software counter Canon uses for the ink monitor to
indicate partially used. However, since the status monitor drops in
increments, there must be something in use to give an approximation of ink
usage. The only accurate and/or positive indicator is the low ink warning
which is triggered by reflected light through the prism in the bottom of the
tank. FWIW, I had a Lexmark 5700 several years ago which used ink at a rapid
pace and at extremelly high $$$. I found the .ini file where the ink usage
was actually updated based on how many droplets of ink were ejected. I
created an Excell spreadsheet to convert this usage to the number of CC's
per color to refill. It was a totally useless exercise since my refills
usually didn't live very long after refilling. I've not seen any file
comparable to that for the Canon models.
Perhaps I'm missing something, perhaps I'm a moron or my IQ is lower
than yours, but some parts of what you've said doesn't make sense.
Sounds a little defensive on your part, but I think you are trying to read
more into this than necessary. The whole point is that if a user wants to,
for reasons known only to them, they can reset the status monitor. A user is
free to reset or not reset. That is their choice - not mine or yours. Why
should it make any difference? It sounds to me like you are opposed to
someone doing a reset. I think it's a non-issue. Perhaps a better mechanism
for Canon to use would be an idiot light mechanism similar to warning lights
on autos. Nothing is shown unless the tanks are about to run out of ink.
Some drivers prefer gauges, while others rely on warning lights. Maybe
that's why my Mazda has both - to prevent useless newsgroup discussions such
as this. Please don't try to read something else into the comparison of a
gas gauge to the ink status monitor. The comment is only made for purposes
of illustration since the status monitor isn't the same, nor does it have
any form of accuracy as would an automotive gauge. If you go back and check
old newsgroup postings, you can find a few trying to make that comparison.