Given that Vista also includes Palladium it would be some special sort ofRich said:
Given that Vista also includes Palladium it would be some special sort of
idiot who would want to install Vista.
This is the way most folk are starting to think. I will run XPee till itI'd imagine I'll end up with a dedicated box for vista with almost
nothing on the hard disk. Just a bare install and whatever software
you need to do business. Zero ID or data. No network.
Thanks Billy, you're so charitable to us all.
The other boxes will be win2000, linux, and a mac.
Venom said:This is the way most folk are starting to think. I will run XPee till it
drops but by then I should be comfortable with Linux.
transfer over. I'm finding moving things like e-mail to be a complete
PITA - I actually had to use Eudora to convert my Outlook Express
e-mail, then clean it using a Eudora Mailbox utility on the Mac side,
then finally installing Eudora for Mac and THEN FINALLY importing it to
mail.app. I told my wife that once we go Mac, we'll never go back,
because it was such a PITA. From what I've seen so far, I doubt I'll
regret it.
SteveSch said:I run Kmail on Linux. It has a very nice conversion script that worked
great from pmail. Maybe they have one for the Mac. Even if it won't
convert exactly to your program it may convert to the proper format for
your machine to read. I had about 30,000 emails to transfer and I really
appreciated the script.
Steve
Rich said:
Yet more posts about MS's DRM... I use Vista.. And I can tell you right
now just about everything people are saying about Paladium is over
blown... It only turns on if you happen to be accessing copy protected
content. If your content, whatever format it may come in, does not
include copy protection then it will be presented to the user as if Vist
had no speacial DRM code embedded in it. It's that simple.
I love it. Palladium has nothing to do with DRM. Palladium belongs toBenjamin Gawert said:* Carlo Razzeto:
I use Vista since November last year, and I can confirm that. There is
no crippeling of audio files or any other such thing, non-DRM-protected
content plays just fine as it does in Windowsxp. Yes, Vista does have
DRM, but that doesn't mean it changes how your non-protected mutimedia
files playback. It just means that Vista can also playback DRM-protected
content which won't be possible with Windowsxp. If DRM-protected content
is good or bad is another story, though.
It's interesting that people still buy into every BS they read on some
website. Everyone with at least some basic IT knowledge should realize
that this article written by this nobody from NZ is just plain crap and
that he has absolutely no clue what he is talking about. Still, there
are dozens of people that buy that shit completely unreflected.
Benjamin
Palladium does have a DRM component. It's just a part of the overallI love it. Palladium has nothing to do with DRM. Palladium belongs to
Microsoft. The only reason people know so little about Palladium is it takes
a lot of reading to understand what Bill Gates wants to do. This causes a
big problem out there in computerland because most of the users can't read
all that well. Never mind. It's your loss.
* Carlo Razzeto:
I use Vista since November last year, and I can confirm that. There is
no crippeling of audio files or any other such thing, non-DRM-protected
content plays just fine as it does in Windowsxp. Yes, Vista does have
DRM, but that doesn't mean it changes how your non-protected mutimedia
files playback. It just means that Vista can also playback DRM-protected
content which won't be possible with Windowsxp. If DRM-protected content
is good or bad is another story, though.
It's interesting that people still buy into every BS they read on some
website. Everyone with at least some basic IT knowledge should realize
that this article written by this nobody from NZ is just plain crap and
that he has absolutely no clue what he is talking about. Still, there
are dozens of people that buy that shit completely unreflected.
Benjamin