G
Guest
I have a simple but good enough PC to install Vista.
But I have many partitions in a linux-style on my HD.
I want to put Vista on my last one that has enough space to receive it.
But the pb is not there !
The setup fails because it tells me that I dont enough space for temporary
files on my C: drive !
Effectively, in my linux-style partitioning, I have a first partition that
is reserved only for the Boot System Files, and therefore it is only 1 GB,
and only 800 MB are free there !
So, I have 2 questions :
1/ Why Vista persists to use by default the first partition for temporary
files ? It should be smart enough to find another one by itself, whichever
would be the suitest one, no ? Could that behaviour during setup be changed
in the final release, because it is a real problem for me if I want a simple
install ????
2/ Is there another way to tell Setup to use another partition for its
temporary files, because this behaviour is crazy/buggy, dont you think, and
still like that after 11 years of the Win95 release ???!!!!
Thanks.
But I have many partitions in a linux-style on my HD.
I want to put Vista on my last one that has enough space to receive it.
But the pb is not there !
The setup fails because it tells me that I dont enough space for temporary
files on my C: drive !
Effectively, in my linux-style partitioning, I have a first partition that
is reserved only for the Boot System Files, and therefore it is only 1 GB,
and only 800 MB are free there !
So, I have 2 questions :
1/ Why Vista persists to use by default the first partition for temporary
files ? It should be smart enough to find another one by itself, whichever
would be the suitest one, no ? Could that behaviour during setup be changed
in the final release, because it is a real problem for me if I want a simple
install ????
2/ Is there another way to tell Setup to use another partition for its
temporary files, because this behaviour is crazy/buggy, dont you think, and
still like that after 11 years of the Win95 release ???!!!!
Thanks.