Best Practice: Patches that are not critical or security related

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

What is the best practice for installing patches that are not listed as
"Critical" or "Security" related? Does Microsoft have an official stand on
this?

Some would say push them all to be safe and fix any potential issues. On
the other side it has been said that by pushing patches for problems that
don't specifically affect you it creates a greater chance that something else
might be broken. Any references containing recommendations or best practices
on this subject? Thanks!
 
paulc2480 said:
What is the best practice for installing patches that are not listed as
"Critical" or "Security" related? Does Microsoft have an official stand
on
this?

Some would say push them all to be safe and fix any potential issues. On
the other side it has been said that by pushing patches for problems that
don't specifically affect you it creates a greater chance that something
else
might be broken. Any references containing recommendations or best
practices
on this subject? Thanks!

Install optional updates if they address a particular issue or
functionality.
For example, windows updates offers a patch for the FAST wizard, not able to
transfer files and settings from a 32-bit machine to a 64-bit machine.
If you need this functionality, you install the patch.

For hardware it is common practice to get drivers from the manufacturer
site. The reason MS lists such updates is because the drivers meet testing
standards.
 
If they are not Critical or security related, they are not really necessary.
Generally, you should install all Critical Updates.
WGA Notification is an exception that many avoid.

"Some would say push them all to be safe..."
They are mistaken as there is no safety or security reason for the
Recommended patches.
If a computer tech is giving you that advice, find a better tech, one who is
competent.

Only you can decide if the particular Recommended update is appropriate for
you.
You need to read the details of the patch and decide if there is potential
benefit for you and install as appropriate.
Microsoft nor anybody else knows your system and usage so no more specific
information can be given for your specific circumstances.

Generally this does not apply to Driver Updates.
For drivers get them directly from the hardware manufacturers website and
not Microsoft.
But then only if you determine there is a potential benefit for you.
 
paulc2480 said:
What is the best practice for installing patches that are not listed as
"Critical" or "Security" related? Does Microsoft have an official stand on
this?

I imagine Microsoft's "Official" stand is that they wouldn't offer the
patches unless they thought they were important. Of course, what's
important to them may not be important to you.

Some would say push them all to be safe and fix any potential issues. On
the other side it has been said that by pushing patches for problems that
don't specifically affect you it creates a greater chance that something else
might be broken. Any references containing recommendations or best practices
on this subject? Thanks!


I really don't like to see people use the Automatic Updates, unless
they take precautions to ensure that no patches get installed without
the user's express permission, given only after he/she has researched
each individual patch to ensure that it applies and is necessary. Due
to the nearly infinite number of possible combinations of hardware,
device drivers, and applications on any given PC, it's impossible to
guarantee that all patches will be 100% harmless. In a very small
number of cases, patches and hotfixes can cause conflicts or other
problems. So, as with all changes to an OS, caution is advised.

All "Critical" updates should be installed. These address serious
issues that can affect a large number of computers. There will be only
rare occasions when a Critical update will not apply. Of special
importance are those that address security vulnerabilities. If people
had installed the available critical updates in July of 2003, the
Blaster and Welchia worms would not have spread throughout the Internet
the following month. In the unlikely event that problems do develop,
you can always use the Control Panel's Add/Remove Programs applet or a
System Restore Point to uninstall the troublesome hotfix.

For the "Recommended" updates, simply study the information
provided to see if these updates apply in your specific situation. If
they don't apply, or you're not experiencing the problem(s) addressed,
you needn't install them. For instance, I have no use for WinXP's
MovieMaker, so I ignore any updates to it. Again, in the unlikely
event that problems do develop, you can always use the Control Panel's
Add/Remove Programs applet or a System Restore Point to uninstall the
troublesome hotfix.

In general, though, I've found it best not to download the
"Driver" updates from Windows Update, unless they're for a hardware
device originally manufactured by Microsoft. Device drivers provided
by each component's manufacturer's web site are likely to perform
better and offer more features than will the watered-down, "generic"
drivers that those manufacturers provide to Microsoft for distribution
via Windows Update.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell
 
Hmm...Your comment about finding a better tech! Not really helpful thats for
sure, are worried about your job? I agree if Microsoft post then maybe that
means they're needed...Just check them..
 
If the tech gives bad information, the OP should find a better one.
Do you think the OP should stay with a tech that gives bad advice?
You may, but I would not.

"agree if Microsoft post then maybe that means they're needed"
And maybe not.
It is not a good idea to install Recommended Updates simply because they are
available.
That is why they are recommended and not Critical or Security issues.

"are worried about your job?"
Not at all, and that is not relevant to the post in any case.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org
 
Back
Top