Best ~ $125 ATI Video Card - AGP

  • Thread starter Thread starter esbaylus
  • Start date Start date
E

esbaylus

Ok,
I've been using ATI Cards for a while, from my 7000 thru the 9250.
Love my PCI TV Wonder.

Now I need a new card for some light game playing - my 6 yo want's to
play Lego Star Wars!!

My old 7000 went south, and I thru an old 3D/FX card in that system...
Can't believe thoose drivers really work with XP...

I am confused by the new number/name scheme used by ATI.

I need an AGP card, hopefully street around $125 give or take.

I would figure the 'higher' the model number, the newer - faster- etc.
- but it doesn't quite look that way.... I've looked around, but can't
get a clear idea what the model numbers mean...

Any help out their??


Gene
 
Ok,
I've been using ATI Cards for a while, from my 7000 thru the 9250.
Love my PCI TV Wonder.
Click to expand...
I need an AGP card, hopefully street around $125 give or take.
Click to expand...

A 9800Pro or XT sounds about right.

Avoid the POS 9800SE.

As the other poster said, Saphire makes the most affordable 9800 on
Newegg. I don't know anything about them, so can't comment on quality.

In any case, look at warantee and user feedback before deciding on what
brand to buy.
I would figure the 'higher' the model number, the newer - faster- etc.
- but it doesn't quite look that way.... I've looked around, but can't
get a clear idea what the model numbers mean...
Click to expand...

http://www.rojakpot.com/default.aspx?location=3&var1=88&var2=0

The higher the fillrate and bandwidth, the better.

- Greg
 
Ok,
I've been using ATI Cards for a while, from my 7000 thru the 9250.
Love my PCI TV Wonder.

Now I need a new card for some light game playing - my 6 yo want's to
play Lego Star Wars!!

My old 7000 went south, and I thru an old 3D/FX card in that system...
Can't believe thoose drivers really work with XP...

I am confused by the new number/name scheme used by ATI.

I need an AGP card, hopefully street around $125 give or take.

I would figure the 'higher' the model number, the newer - faster- etc.
- but it doesn't quite look that way.... I've looked around, but can't
get a clear idea what the model numbers mean...

Any help out their??


Gene
Click to expand...
I would get, on a budget, a "build by ati" 9800xt or a pro version
whit a 256megs of video ram, or a xt version with 256 mb of video ram.
It was a big card a few years ago but it still a good card.
 
That (9800) sounds good .... ?? Better then the X700 128 MB I can get
for $125??

Some games, but video editing / transcoding??


Gene
 
That (9800) sounds good .... ?? Better then the X700 128 MB I can get
for $125??
Click to expand...

It's a lot better than a straight X700 non-pro. And only a little worse than
an X700 Pro at resolutions above 1024x768. At 1024x768 or below they're the
same.
 
It's a lot better than a straight X700 non-pro. And only a little worse than
an X700 Pro at resolutions above 1024x768. At 1024x768 or below they're the
same.
Click to expand...

i do not agree the x700-pro is way better than the 9800pro. And you
will see the differrence at high resolution like 1280x720 and more
because of the better frame rate. my old 9800pro build by ati was
scoring around 2500 at 3dmark05 vr120. And now with the x700pro i'm
getting 3064. So its a little bit better and it has all the new
feature that the 9800pro doesn't Like HDtv, dxva, pixel shader, mesh
shader 2.b

See on the ati web site.
http://apps.ati.com/ATIcompare/result.asp


Also your experience will vary whit the brand that you've chose. So
your better stick with the pro like cards build by ati or nvdia.

Run away from saphir and power color.
 
i do not agree the x700-pro is way better than the 9800pro. And you
will see the differrence at high resolution like 1280x720 and more
because of the better frame rate. my old 9800pro build by ati was
scoring around 2500 at 3dmark05 vr120. And now with the x700pro i'm
getting 3064. So its a little bit better and it has all the new
feature that the 9800pro doesn't Like HDtv, dxva, pixel shader, mesh
shader 2.b

See on the ati web site.
http://apps.ati.com/ATIcompare/result.asp


Also your experience will vary whit the brand that you've chose. So
your better stick with the pro like cards build by ati or nvdia.
Click to expand...
Erm, NVidea don't make cards, DDC.
Run away from saphir and power color.
Click to expand...

TBH the only problem I found with a Sapphire card I had (a 9600Pro
with VIVO) was it it wouldn't run the MMC TV/Video In app, which I
suspect is by design. In every other respect it was the equivalent of
an ATI card, and from other people's comments I would think you could
say the same of most of the better OEMs.

And all NVidea cards, of course are OEMs.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...
 
Erm, NVidea don't make cards, DDC.


TBH the only problem I found with a Sapphire card I had (a 9600Pro
with VIVO) was it it wouldn't run the MMC TV/Video In app, which I
suspect is by design. In every other respect it was the equivalent of
an ATI card, and from other people's comments I would think you could
say the same of most of the better OEMs.

And all NVidea cards, of course are OEMs.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...
Click to expand...
Well in exemple these card like saphire are mostly all the time
underclocked. or are joint to a passive heat sink for some earlyer
video card.

Here i go
this link tells about the sapphire 9800pro ultimate. the most advence
card of the brand in the 9800series.
http://www.sapphiretech.com/en/products/graphics_specifications.php?gpid=35

And this is the 9800pro stock from ati.
http://www.sapphiretech.com/en/products/graphics_specifications.php?gpid=35

notice the Pixel Fillrate 3.04 Gpixels/sec, from ati
notice Showcasing 8 shader pipelines, delivering a fill rate of over
2.8 GigaPixels per second, from sapphire.


ho and again notice that the 9800series card of the sapphire brand is
an XT which is the most powerfull card on the ati web site in the 9800
series.

What's funny in that story is that sapphire have put on a big heat
sink and a more bigger fan to cool the video card. This is certain
that they have to do so because everyone will have to OC that VC just
to get to stock speed of the regular video card from ati.

ddc
 
Well in exemple these card like saphire are mostly all the time
underclocked. or are joint to a passive heat sink for some earlyer
video card.

Here i go
this link tells about the sapphire 9800pro ultimate. the most advence
card of the brand in the 9800series.
http://www.sapphiretech.com/en/products/graphics_specifications.php?gpid=35

And this is the 9800pro stock from ati.
http://www.sapphiretech.com/en/products/graphics_specifications.php?gpid=35

notice the Pixel Fillrate 3.04 Gpixels/sec, from ati
notice Showcasing 8 shader pipelines, delivering a fill rate of over
2.8 GigaPixels per second, from sapphire.


ho and again notice that the 9800series card of the sapphire brand is
an XT which is the most powerfull card on the ati web site in the 9800
series.

What's funny in that story is that sapphire have put on a big heat
sink and a more bigger fan to cool the video card. This is certain
that they have to do so because everyone will have to OC that VC just
to get to stock speed of the regular video card from ati.

ddc
Click to expand...


Er, both those links are for the same card, ddc.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...
 
Here is the correct link, sorry.
http://apps.ati.com/ATIcompare/result.asp And if it's no worlking
click this link and look for the 9800pro.
http://apps.ati.com/ATIcompare/
Click to expand...


Difficult to say, really, ddc. First, we're not actually comparing
like for like; secondly, the Sapphire description is not very precise:
it says "_over_ 2.8 GigaPixels per second, whereas the ATI card simply
says "3.04 Gpixels/sec" - presumably a maximum.

I remain unconvinced.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...
 
Difficult to say, really, ddc. First, we're not actually comparing
like for like; secondly, the Sapphire description is not very precise:
it says "_over_ 2.8 GigaPixels per second, whereas the ATI card simply
says "3.04 Gpixels/sec" - presumably a maximum.

I remain unconvinced.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...
Click to expand...


It up 2 u.
 
OK, is the x800 or x850 a better deal?? (do BOTH come AGP??)

Will the x1300 be even better?? AGP available??

Life used to be so much more simple.... to many ATI
options.......................


Gene
 
Back
Top