Hello David,
Ok. I think we have found the right solution.
If you have any other issues, please feel free to let me know. I am glad to
be of assistance.
Have a nice day!
Thanks and regards,
Alex Zhang
Microsoft Partner Online Support
Get Secure! - <
www.microsoft.com/security>
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
| Reply-To: "David Bock" <
[email protected]>
| From: "David Bock" <
[email protected]>
| References: <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
| Subject: Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
| Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:06:10 -0600
| Lines: 286
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| NNTP-Posting-Host: cust-216-59-196-46.t-speed.net 216.59.196.46
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:58268
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
|
| OK, I thought I was in the right place, but I will try over there...
|
| David Bock
| | > Hello David,
| >
| > Thank you for your reply.
| >
| > Please post this question in the
| > microsoft.public.windows2000.Active_directory newsgroup. The
| > microsoft.public.windows2000.Active_directory newsgroup is primarily for
| > issues involving Active Directory. We recommend posting appropriately so
| > you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and so other
partners
| > who regularly read the newsgroups can either share their knowledge or
| learn
| > from your interaction with us.
| >
| > In addition, I am glad to provide some information to you.
| >
| > When a slow link is detected, the default behavior is as follows:
| >
| > Policies that are applied by default:
| > Registry settings (from administrative templates) must always be
| > applied--this cannot be changed
| > Security policies must always be applied - this cannot be changed)
| > EFS recovery policy
| > IP security
| > Policies that are not applied:
| > Application Deployment
| > Scripts
| > Folder Redirection
| > Disk Quotas
| >
| > Therefore you could try to change the slow link detection speed to be
| > higher.
| >
| > To change the slow link detection speed for Windows 2000 when user Group
| > Policy is being applied, expand the User Configuration node and navigate
| to
| > the Administrative Templates\System\Group Policy folder. Modify the
Group
| > Policy slow link detection policy.
| >
| > For more information you may browse the following websites:
| > How a Slow Link Is Detected for Processing User Profiles and Group
Policy
| >
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;227260
| >
| > Default Behavior for Group Policy Extensions with Slow Link
| >
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;227369
| >
| > In addition, I am glad to provide you some related information about
| Active
| > Directory replication:
| > Active Directory Replication Events During Scheduled Available Windows
| >
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;228866
| >
| > HOW TO: Configure Site Link Replication in Windows 2000
| >
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321253
| >
| > Determining the Inter-Site Topology Generator (ISTG) of a Site in the
| > Active Directory
| >
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224599
| >
| > The Role of the Inter-Site Topology Generator in Active Directory
| > Replication
| >
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224815
| >
| > Active Directory Replication
| >
http://labmice.techtarget.com/activedirectory/AD_replication.htm
| >
| > This response contains a reference to a third-party World Wide Web site.
| > Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you.
Microsoft
| > does not control these sites and has not tested any software or
| information
| > found on these sites; therefore, Microsoft cannot make any
representations
| > regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or
| > information found there. There are inherent dangers in the use of any
| > software found on the Internet, and Microsoft cautions you to make sure
| > that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any software
| from
| > the Internet.
| >
| > I hope the information proves helpful!
| > If you have any questions please do not hesitate to let me know. I am
| glad
| > to be of assistance.
| > Thanks and regards,
| > Alex Zhang
| > Microsoft Partner Online Support
| > Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
| >
| > =====================================================
| > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
| > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
| > =====================================================
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
| rights.
| > --------------------
| > | Reply-To: "David Bock" <
[email protected]>
| > | From: "David Bock" <
[email protected]>
| > | References: <
[email protected]>
| > <
[email protected]>
| > | Subject: Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
| > | Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:52:15 -0600
| > | Lines: 146
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| > | Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: cust-216-59-196-46.t-speed.net 216.59.196.46
| > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:58100
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > |
| > | Thanks Alex...If I may call you Alex.
| > | I have 3 subnodes and 1 central office.
| > | ->ISDN lines at remote locations start at a Pipeline ISDN router
| (10.0.x)
| > | network, I have each node set as a class C, a server at each location.
| > | ->Internal ISDN router is a Ascend Max (10.0.1.1)
| > | -> Internet connection is through a Netscreen Firewall, We have a VPN
| > | connection set through this. (10.0.1.2)
| > | -> Internally we use a company called T-Speed for a broadband
connection
| > | (Microwave 1-6MBPS) at main location
| > | -> On Node 10.0.3.x we also have a T-Speed Connection
| > | -> DNS server uses 10.0.1.1 as gateway, which forwards to 10.0.1.2 for
| out
| > | to the internet.
| > | -> I have disabled the 10.0.3.x ISDN connection, and enabled an
internet
| > VPN
| > | through my Firewall (10.0.1.2)
| > | -> Windows 2000 Network Main domain is on 10.0.1.x (GC at 10.0.1.20,
| Exch
| > | Server 10.0.1.30)
| > | -> on node 10.0.3.x there is a trusted domain (I didn't set it up)
| > | -> When we set up the VPN the remote server took all available
bandwidth
| > | through the tunnell, and there was no room for other traffic through
the
| > | connection. I throttled the connection down to 384k, and I was able to
| > | access the internet.
| > | -> The ISDN is a dual B channell (384K)
| > | -> switching over, I disabled the ISDN connection through the Ascend,
| and
| > | enabled the VPN
| > | -> Database is on 10.0.1.20 (Master GC) and I if the connection goes
| down
| > we
| > | cannot access the database, so I think it is all in 1 place
| > | -> Right now I have a router problem, so 10.0.4.X, 10.0.5.X cannot see
| the
| > | internet, I have a the person who sold me the ISDN routers coming by
| today
| > | to fix that problem.
| > | -> Before I throttled down the bandwith the VPN tunnel expanded to the
| > full
| > | bandwidth available from traffic between the servers, and there was no
| > | available bandwidth for anybody.
| > | -> I would (ideally) like to be able to have the connection be down
and
| > use
| > | the SQL at all locations, but I have security concerns.
| > | -> I think that there is a better way for the directory structure (as
in
| > | sub-domains not trusted Domains)
| > | -> I would like to let all connections run at full speed.
| > | -> I have a 512K DSL connection that I will be changing over at
10.0.4.X
| > | once we get this all figured out.
| > |
| > | I really apreciate your help on this, I understand what I needed to
set
| up
| > | the Active directory on a local system, but I am not sure once we get
to
| > | WANS and routers how things need to be to replicate. Is there a book
or
| > text
| > | I could use to help me through this?
| > |
| > | Thanks again,
| > | David Bock
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | > Hello David,
| > | >
| > | > Thank you for posting here.
| > | >
| > | > If I understand the issue correctly, you have a central location
and
| > | three
| > | > sub locations. You connect these three various locations with 3 ISDN
| > | lines.
| > | > Now you are going to update some of the lines to DSL with VPN.
| > | >
| > | > To understand the issue better, I'd like to confirm the following
| > | > information with you:
| > | >
| > | > 1. How do you update ISDN to DSL? What¡¯s the varieties on hardware?
| Do
| > | you
| > | > use a router or other hardware? Any detail informaiton about the
| network
| > | is
| > | > helpful.
| > | >
| > | > 2. How do you switch the connection over to broadband the 2 servers
| > | > communicate with all available bandwidth? Do you modify the
| > configuration
| > | > on the router or using other methods?
| > | >
| > | > 3. What¡¯s the value of all available bandwidth?
| > | >
| > | > 4. Does the database locate in the central location?
| > | >
| > | > 5. Which location can not access internet?
| > | >
| > | > 6. Do you have any other concerns?
| > | >
| > | > 7. Can you explain in detail ¡°leave the tunnel up with all
available
| > | > bandwidth on a hardware level¡±?
| > | >
| > | > If you have any questions please do not hesitate to let me know. I
am
| > | glad
| > | > to be of assistance.
| > | >
| > | > Thanks and regards,
| > | >
| > | > Alex Zhang
| > | > Microsoft Partner Online Support
| > | > Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
| > | > =====================================================
| > | > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your
newsreader
| so
| > | > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
| > | > =====================================================
| > | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
| > | rights.
| > | > --------------------
| > | > | Reply-To: "David Bock" <
[email protected]>
| > | > | From: "David Bock" <
[email protected]>
| > | > | Subject: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
| > | > | Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:58:34 -0600
| > | > | Lines: 20
| > | > | X-Priority: 3
| > | > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| > | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| > | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| > | > | Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| > | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: cust-216-59-196-46.t-speed.net 216.59.196.46
| > | > | Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
| > | > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.win2000.networking:57914
| > | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
| > | > |
| > | > | Hi, I have a WAN with a central location. We have a router with 3
| ISDN
| > | > lines
| > | > | going to various locations.
| > | > | We wanted more bandwidth, so I am updating some of the lines to
DSL
| > | > through
| > | > | a VPN.
| > | > |
| > | > | We set the DC at a sub location (it is a seperate trusted Domain)
It
| > | seems
| > | > | that when I switched the connection over to broadband the 2
servers
| > | > | communicate with all available bandwidth. There is no way to even
| > access
| > | > the
| > | > | internet around the tunnell. We have a database ap that needs to
| run,
| > | and
| > | > | this unstoppable chat pegs my connection.
| > | > |
| > | > | I was able to wok around this by throttling the bandwidth down to
| 384K
| > | > | through my VPN. I would like to leave the tunnel up with all
| available
| > | > | bandwidth. Is there a way to do this on a hardware level?
| > | > |
| > | > | Thanks,
| > | > | David Bock
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
|
|
|
