T
TonyT
Hi,
My current application is all A2k, but I'm doing a major re-release as an
mde in 2007 for the front end. The Backend will undergo major changes too,
but ideally I'd like to stick with 2000 so as not to force my customers to
have to purchase an upgrade.
Would I notice a real life performance gain using 2007 as opposed to 2000
purely in backend performance? Current fe version is about 60 forms, 60
queries with the be having about 40 tables with up to perhaps 200,000 records
in the most populus and an average of maybe 12 fields per table. Average of 4
concurrent PC's accessing over 100Mbit lans.
Once I have the front end up and running I make look to go to an SQL
backend, but my customers are very low tech and ummm cost conscious.
Any comments greatly received.
My current application is all A2k, but I'm doing a major re-release as an
mde in 2007 for the front end. The Backend will undergo major changes too,
but ideally I'd like to stick with 2000 so as not to force my customers to
have to purchase an upgrade.
Would I notice a real life performance gain using 2007 as opposed to 2000
purely in backend performance? Current fe version is about 60 forms, 60
queries with the be having about 40 tables with up to perhaps 200,000 records
in the most populus and an average of maybe 12 fields per table. Average of 4
concurrent PC's accessing over 100Mbit lans.
Once I have the front end up and running I make look to go to an SQL
backend, but my customers are very low tech and ummm cost conscious.
Any comments greatly received.