Anonymous wrote:
...
He, he... how come you assume anybody could trust such a posting?
Why not?
Why does my desire to maintain my privacy have any bearing on a bit of free
advice that I choose to give in the form of "Free advice, take or leave as
you see fit"?
The OP had a problem that had to do with html being rendered in their mail
client. I suggested they consider Quicksilver because instead of rendering
html it strips it out of the msg, leaving the reader completly safe from
email that carries little nastys hidden in it's html based content. I've
used it myself for over a year and have NO complaints.
The fact that I chose to respond anonymously to preserve my privacy and
identity has NOTHING to do with it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit
www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.