C
Chris Simpson
Where can I DL the latest version of Asus Probe, I looked on the web
site I could not find the tools section...
site I could not find the tools section...
Chris Simpson said:Where can I DL the latest version of Asus Probe, I looked on the web
site I could not find the tools section...
Chris said:Where can I DL the latest version of Asus Probe, I looked on the web
site I could not find the tools section...
Ben Pope said:Don't bother... grab MBM5, it's loads better.
Under support/downloads.
Phil said:All a matter of opinion....
=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Phil said:All a matter of opinion....
Probe doesn't grab the diode temperature (at least on my board)... so it's
pretty useless for temperature monitoring.
Ben
Creeping said:=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Probe doesn't grab the diode temperature (at least on my board)... soPhil said:news:[email protected]...
it's pretty useless for temperature monitoring.
Come off it ;]
Neither MBM or Probe can read the diode temp on my board - but the
available sensors are far from 'useless'
=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Creeping said:=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Phil wrote:
Probe doesn't grab the diode temperature (at least on my board)... so
it's pretty useless for temperature monitoring.
Come off it ;]
Neither MBM or Probe can read the diode temp on my board - but the
available sensors are far from 'useless'
Socket temp doesn't really give you a good impression of diode temp. If I
subtract socket temp from diode temps, I've seen anything from +15°C
to -5°C. 20°C of variation is hardly ideal, especially as many people seem
to think cpu temp (diode) is cpu temp (socket).
I'll change my statement fro "useless" to "misleading at best" - thats
assuming it calls the socket temp "cpu temp", which I think it does.
Ben
Creeping said:=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= said:Socket temp doesn't really give you a good impression of diode temp. If
I subtract socket temp from diode temps, I've seen anything from +15°C
to -5°C. 20°C of variation is hardly ideal, especially as many people
seem to think cpu temp (diode) is cpu temp (socket).
I'll change my statement fro "useless" to "misleading at best" - thats
assuming it calls the socket temp "cpu temp", which I think it does.
I would like to read the diode temp - but then, to think of that as the
'real' temp is a matter of context too. So its a more reactive, relevant
indicator than the board cpu temp, the other sensor lags behind, but I
find it sufficient to judge how hot its running in the medium term.
Id only be mislead by it, if I didnt wait for it to plateau, or if I was
taking it as being securely calibrated - I take it as a laggy stress level
indicator which loosely relates to temp..
hehe, sure the diode might be handy.