V
vryhpy
The title is a joke, clearly I don't want DLL Hell. However, I am
curious if there is a way to follow the shared DLL model of the past
using the GAC.
Specificially -
I have ten seperate console applications, lets call them
'ConsoleApp1.exe' through 'ConsoleApp10.exe' which each depend on a
single class library named 'Utility.dll' which is strongly named and
installed in the GAC, v1.0.0.1
I regularly develop performance improvments to 'Utility.dll' which I
want all the console apps to benefit from. Over time, i develop
v1.0.0.2 , v1.0.0.3 all the way to v1.0.0.9 - each time I wish to
deploy the updated library and have all of the console apps use it.
Is there any way for me to install the new class library in the GAC
and have it used by all console apps WITHOUT using a Publisher Policy
File (i.e., is there any way to mark the new library as "compatible"
and therefor the console apps will use the newer version).
Thanks,
Maurice Flanagan
curious if there is a way to follow the shared DLL model of the past
using the GAC.
Specificially -
I have ten seperate console applications, lets call them
'ConsoleApp1.exe' through 'ConsoleApp10.exe' which each depend on a
single class library named 'Utility.dll' which is strongly named and
installed in the GAC, v1.0.0.1
I regularly develop performance improvments to 'Utility.dll' which I
want all the console apps to benefit from. Over time, i develop
v1.0.0.2 , v1.0.0.3 all the way to v1.0.0.9 - each time I wish to
deploy the updated library and have all of the console apps use it.
Is there any way for me to install the new class library in the GAC
and have it used by all console apps WITHOUT using a Publisher Policy
File (i.e., is there any way to mark the new library as "compatible"
and therefor the console apps will use the newer version).
Thanks,
Maurice Flanagan