jma said:
I'm very leery about buying a "value" board but the ASRock 939Dual-
SATA2 is my only option if I want to upgrade to Socket 939 and continue
using my existing AGP card (Radeon X800 XT.) I read there were boot-up
problems when the board first came out but they've supposedly been
fixed with a BIOS update.
This is for my gaming rig, so my main concerns are stability and
compatibility with other hardware and software (I don't OC.) I've read
the benchmark reviews but how does this board run in the real world?
If it's a dog I'll hold off upgrading (and buy the A8N32-SLI Deluxe
later) as I'm not ready to ditch the X800 XT yet.
And what would be wrong with an Asus A8V or A8V Deluxe ?
The Via K8T800pro chipset does AGP.
That Asrock board has a real AGP slot on it, due to the use of the
flexible ULI chipset. On other Asrock boards, they have an "AGI"
slot, which reduces performance. So, that will not be a problem
in this case.
http://www.techpowerup.com/printreview.php?id=/ASRock/939Dual-SATA2
You should have a look around, and find benchmarks for the U1695
chipset, to see how the various options perform.
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2471&p=8
The Asrock board does a couple of SATA ports via the Southbridge,
and has a separate chip (JMB360) for a SATA2 port.
http://www.jmicron.com.tw/product/jmb360.htm
Whether buying an Asrock board is a good idea, really depends on
what people think of the quality and level of BIOS support,
whether drivers are conveniently located for download, and
whether the board architecture is good. In this case, I don't
see any of the usual shortcuts in the board architecture, so
this is really a matter of whether the ULI chips and the
Asrock BIOS, function correctly. (Download the user manual
and check the BIOS screens, to see if memory timing, clock
speeds, voltages and so on, are adjustable. Sometimes those
adjustments are essential to getting stability, like when
solving memory compatibility problems.)
The Asrock processor list for the board, is here:
http://www.asrock.com/support/CPU_Support/show.asp?Model=939Dual-SATA2
When it comes to architecture, there is a tendency for both Asrock
and Asus, to hide tiny details about the implementation. Asrock by
far is the worst offender, and Asus only fudges occasionally. There is
no explanation for how AGI works from Asrock, and on some Asus boards,
when a PCI-e x4 slot is offered, it turns out that sometimes there are
only two PCI-e x1 lanes connected to the x4 slot. In cases like that,
a little more honesty would be nice. (You shouldn't need a comp-sci
degree and a hand calculator, to work out what the feature set is.
)
HTH,
Paul