Hi Andrew,
I am glad it makes sense to you.
If you still have any question, please feel to tell me.
Best regards,
Jeffrey Tan
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
--------------------
| Reply-To: "Andrew Ochsner" <
[email protected]>
| From: "Andrew Ochsner" <
[email protected]>
| References: <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
<#
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
| Subject: Re: Aspects
| Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:52:02 -0700
| Lines: 130
| Organization: Qwest
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
| NNTP-Posting-Host: machine45.qwest.net 204.154.239.45
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp:196953
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
|
| Jeffrey:
|
| Thanks! The first link to the Panel discussion was actually exactly what
I
| was looking for. I was at the PDC but was unable to attend that panel
(was
| at another) and was curious if it ever came up. Thanks!
|
| Andy O
|
|
| | >
| > Hi Andrew,
| >
| > There is some talk in the link below, and one section of it talks about
| the
| > plans for things like aspect oriented programming and related
techniques.
| >
|
http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/jasonz/commentview.aspx/efae2b1f-61af-4c66-8dbe-d
| > c6b86c20645
| >
| > You can some information about the future of Microsoft developer tools
at:
| >
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/productinfo/roadmap.aspx
| >
| > And now, the C# Version 2.0 Language Specification is available, you can
| > get it from:
| >
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/
| >
| > Hope this helps,
| >
| > Best regards,
| > Jeffrey Tan
| > Microsoft Online Partner Support
| > Get Secure! -
www.microsoft.com/security
| > This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no
rights.
| >
| > --------------------
| > | Reply-To: "Andrew Ochsner" <
[email protected]>
| > | From: "Andrew Ochsner" <
[email protected]>
| > | References: <
[email protected]>
| > <
[email protected]>
| > | Subject: Re: Aspects
| > | Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:22:14 -0700
| > | Lines: 62
| > | Organization: Qwest
| > | X-Priority: 3
| > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
| > | Message-ID: <#
[email protected]>
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: machine45.qwest.net 204.154.239.45
| > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp:196426
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
| > |
| > | Thanks
| > | Yes, I've looked at ContextBoundObjects and an article on MSDN (for
| those
| > | interested,
| > |
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/03/AOP/default.aspx). It
| > seems
| > | a bit heavy-handed and not very integrated into the CLR. Was just
| curious
| > | on if future releases might consider using AOP a bit more, and if not,
| why
| > | not? Know there's been lots of discussions about the value of it (or
| > | dangers I suppose) and I'm not an expert when it comes to AOP so I
| wasn't
| > | sure if there are sound reasons not to include tighter integration.
| > |
| > | Thanks again
| > | Andy O
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | > Hi Andrew,
| > | > IFAIK, aspects are supported by .NET in general. I don't think c#
will
| > | > provide more support than that.
| > | > Take a look at:
| > | > ContextBoundObject class and IMessageSink interface.
| > | > As well as:
| > | > IContextAttribute, IContextProperty, IContributeServerContextSink,
| > | > IContributeObjectSink, IContributeEnvoySink and
| > | > IContributeClientContextSink.
| > | >
| > | > Using the latter interfaces along with custom attributes you can
| inject
| > | > message sinks and realize your call's aspects.
| > | >
| > | > Unfortunately for the latter interfaces MSDN says just:
| > | > "This member supports the .NET Framework infrastructure and is not
| > | intended
| > | > to be used directly from your code."
| > | >
| > | > So you have to look at other sources for info and examples.
| > | > The only book I've read that covers this topic is Don Box' book
| > | "Essential
| > | > .NET vol. 1".
| > | >
| > | > Hopefully the others on the group can suggest other good books
| covering
| > | > that.
| > | >
| > | > HTH
| > | > B\rgds
| > | > 100
| > | >
| > | > | > | > > Wanted to get thoughts around supporting Aspects and
| > | > > Aspect Oriented programming in C#...
| > | > >
| > | > > Is it being considered (presumably through attributes)
| > | > > and is there a timeline for it?
| > | > >
| > | > > Thanks
| > | > > Andy O
| > | > >
| > | > >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
|
|
|
