Artificial intelligence (AI) has been solved

  • Thread starter Thread starter Laurent Bossavit
  • Start date Start date
L

Laurent Bossavit

Artificial intelligence (AI) has arguably been solved

If it has, why isn't it telling us itself ?
 
<PRE>
________ ________
/ \ / \
( Motorium ) ______ ( Security )
________ \________/\ / \ /\________/ _________
/ \ \/ main \/ / \
( Volition )-----------( Alife )----------( Sensorium )
\________/ ________ /\ loop /\ _______ \_________/
/ \/ \______/ \/ \
( Think ) ( Emotion )
\________/ \_______/
</PRE>

Artificial intelligence (AI) has arguably been solved in
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/theory5.html theory and
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/jsaimind.html software.

Do-It-Yourself Artificial Intelligence is described at
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/acm.html -- DIY AI.

One language which needs native AI Mind coding is
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/apl.html -- APL.

Please code and release here a freeware version of the main
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/alife.html -- AI mind loop.
 
Laurent said:
If it has, why isn't it telling us itself ?
Click to expand...

Are you sure that it isn't? 80)>

A team of 50 world class computer scientists decided that they'd
connect 200 of the world's fastest computers to see what would happen.

After a lot of work, they succeeded in accomplishing the task. With
anxious fingers, one of them sat down at the keyboard and typed:

"Is there a God?"

The answer immediately came back:

"There is now."
 
If it has, why isn't it telling us itself ?
Click to expand...

Someone once said something like that true articicial intelligence
would be when a group of experts conversed with an AI and humans (over
a computer so could not tell by looking at it/him/her!) and could not
tell the difference.

Maybe (e-mail address removed) (alias Arthur T. Murray)who originated this
thread) is such an AI!!
 
Someone once said something like that true articicial intelligence
would be when a group of experts conversed with an AI and humans (over
a computer so could not tell by looking at it/him/her!) and could not
tell the difference.

Maybe (e-mail address removed) (alias Arthur T. Murray)who originated this
thread) is such an AI!!
Click to expand...


Gee - and here's me thinking I was in touch with a human!!
 
Someone once said something like that true articicial intelligence
would be when a group of experts conversed with an AI and humans (over
a computer so could not tell by looking at it/him/her!) and could not
tell the difference.
Click to expand...

It was Alan Turing, and it's called the "Turing Test".
 
#include <stdio.h>

/* A-I informs us that it has been solved. */
int main()
{
printf("A-I has been solved\n");

return 0;
}
 
: OldAmigaBoy wrote:
:> Arthur T. Murray wrote:
:>>Artificial intelligence (AI) has arguably been solved
:> Someone once said something like that true articicial intelligence
:> would be when a group of experts conversed with an AI and humans (over
:> a computer so could not tell by looking at it/him/her!) and could not
:> tell the difference.

: int main()
: {
: printf("A-I has been solved\n");
:
: return 0;
: }

Well I sure can't tell the difference between this program and Arthur.
Case closed.

-Greg
 
OldAmigaBoy said:
Someone once said something like that true articicial intelligence
would be when a group of experts conversed with an AI and humans (over
a computer so could not tell by looking at it/him/her!) and could not
tell the difference.

Maybe (e-mail address removed) (alias Arthur T. Murray)who originated this
thread) is such an AI!!
Click to expand...

I remember hearing that one group actually did test their AI software
by setting it up to post in various Usenet newsgroups...

Regards,

Mel.
 
I remember hearing that one group actually did test their AI software
by setting it up to post in various Usenet newsgroups...
Click to expand...

Wouldn't work--it would be *too smart* to pass for the average
level of discourse in many newsgroups... ;-)
--Donald Davis
 
| OldAmigaBoy wrote:
|
| > On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:33:55 +0200, Laurent Bossavit
| >
| >
| >>>Artificial intelligence (AI) has arguably been solved
| >>>
| #include <stdio.h>
|
| /* A-I informs us that it has been solved. */
| int main()
| {
| printf("A-I has been solved\n");
|
| return 0;
| }

How about this?

#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
printf("Eliza: What makes you say that %s?\n", argv[1]);
return 0;
}

Of course, if you run it without arguments, the results are indeterminate,
as with a person. ;-)
 
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
printf("Eliza: What makes you say that %s?\n", argv[1]);
return 0;
}

Of course, if you run it without arguments, the results are
indeterminate, as with a person. ;-)
Click to expand...

Ahem. Your online Pedantic Interactive Language Lawyer program replies if
you run that without arguments, the Standard(s) place a "" in the last argv,
so the results are a program with defined behavior, but poor grammar ("..say
that ?" with a space).
Click to expand...

Just goes to show. If you make a statement without an argument,
you get indeterminate results. Hence, I must supply the missing
argument:

The Standard (N869, actually) explicitly says that argv[argc]
shall be a null pointer. argv[1] is thus equal to NULL for
argc==1, and undefined for argc==0. Neither of these is related
in any way (save type) to the empty string "".

There's your argument. Now can we get some defined results?
And maybe a little less random cross-posting?

-Arthur
 
Back
Top