Sky King said:
Bill, if MS cannot prevent the intrusion of such a simple thing as a
plain-text newsgroup post into a specific area of their server, it doesn't
say a lot about an ability to protect a more serious intrusion elsewhere.
To have this newsgroup wide open for this particular test is irony verging
on the tragic.
Isn't it actually a lack of technical knowledge causing this newsgroup to
be wide open to all? MS has deftly handled the Read-Only attribute for
other newsgroups; apparently they don't want to make the effort to learn
how that is done on this one.
I'd certainly hope that MS finds this situation embarrassing. I certainly
do when clients and co-workers ask me about it.
I'd like to step in to comment on this particular question, since, as the
newsgroups administrator, it's my balliwick.
I can deftly handly the read-only attribute for newsgroups quite well, thank
you. However, the older web based interface does *not* handle the read-only
attribute. It does not directly understand what 'read-only' is. As the web
based interface is used for these private newsgroups, setting a read-only
attribute on this newsgroup so that NNTP clients can not post to it is kind
of silly, since anyone coming in via the web would be freely available to
post. In fact, that was what happened with the SP2 newsgroups.
I'm trying to find a solution that would allow for a read only newsgroup on
the older web interface, but I'm not confident there is one.
To stave off the two FAQs I can see:
1) Well, why don't you fix the old one?
Because a newer solution is being worked on.
2) Well, why don't you use the newer solution?
Because it's not finished.
John Eddy
Microsoft Newsgroups Administrator