J
John Dann
I need to do a fair amount of comb-binding of documents that I print.
But I've found that most of the inexpensive laser printers that I've
looked at tend to curl the paper either significantly or a lot, so as
to make comb-binding a very inefficient and frustrating process.
(Slightly - sometime even imperceptibly - curled paper can just refuse
to sit cleanly under the punches of lower capacity comb binders,
leading to a lot of wastage with mis-punched pages). Note that
typically this doesn't happen with pages from a commercial
photocopier.
Just wondering whether anyone might have a recommendation for an
inexpensive laser printer (with duplex facility) that only puts a
minimal curl on the paper. (I guess it's too much to ask for one that
doesn't curl the paper at all).
Maybe because all inexpensive laser printers tend to have small
diameter drums this is the root cause of the problem, with standard
photocopiers having larger drums and hence inducing less curl? So on
this thinking I will be out of luck? Interestingly inkjets don't seem
to give the same problem presumably because there's no heat involved,
but automatic duplexing on inkjets tends to be an unacceptably slow
process because of the need for one side to dry before printing the
flip side.
Thanks for any comments.
JGD
But I've found that most of the inexpensive laser printers that I've
looked at tend to curl the paper either significantly or a lot, so as
to make comb-binding a very inefficient and frustrating process.
(Slightly - sometime even imperceptibly - curled paper can just refuse
to sit cleanly under the punches of lower capacity comb binders,
leading to a lot of wastage with mis-punched pages). Note that
typically this doesn't happen with pages from a commercial
photocopier.
Just wondering whether anyone might have a recommendation for an
inexpensive laser printer (with duplex facility) that only puts a
minimal curl on the paper. (I guess it's too much to ask for one that
doesn't curl the paper at all).
Maybe because all inexpensive laser printers tend to have small
diameter drums this is the root cause of the problem, with standard
photocopiers having larger drums and hence inducing less curl? So on
this thinking I will be out of luck? Interestingly inkjets don't seem
to give the same problem presumably because there's no heat involved,
but automatic duplexing on inkjets tends to be an unacceptably slow
process because of the need for one side to dry before printing the
flip side.
Thanks for any comments.
JGD