Armin Zingler said:
You are using the ActiveX Listview, not the .NET Framework listview?? This
can explain a lot! Interop can sloooooow down things considerably - apart
from the fact CJ mentioned that one should work with the the datasource not
the UI.
The Properties list shows System.Windows.Forms.ListView
I think that means I'm using the >NET version. Right?
I don't actually remember deleting the old one and replacing it (I did so
much of that kind or thing.)
What made (makes?) you think I'm using the ActiveX version?
(BTW, did you start the thread? Are you TryingLikeHeck? I'm unsure...)
What does BTW stand for?
Yes. I have two ISP's
If I'm always online it's because I've converted a large app and as soon as
I clear up one problem I move on to another. And I've received wonderful
insight from this group. For example, the fact that just because single
stepping in the IDE highlights a statement does mean it actually got
executed. That's something it would take a long time to surmise. -
Numerous other things, like no use looking for a way to make the IDE
automatically compile only modules that have been changed since the last
compile. I was sure I only had to find the correct switch. Very helpful to
be told to stop looking. Anyway, I really appreciate the help and I am
trying.
I suggestion about ArrayList made me try dimensioning the arrays large
enough so that redim is never required, but that didn't help. There are
other thing going that may be using the time but I wanted to be sure
ListViews were not known to be time consumming.
Thanks for all the NG's past help and in particular your past help,
Cal