Archive vs Backup

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sandra
  • Start date Start date
S

Sandra

Hi,

I have a question. Is there a need to archive if I have plenty of harddrive
space and I back up my .pst file twice a day? I am not sure I understand the
purpose.
 
Me neither. I think auto-archive is more for people who don't clean up their
mail and still want an empty mailbox. ;-)

Backing up a pst-file doesn't empty it archiving does as it moves old
content to another pst-file named archive.pst by default.

Backing up the pst-file on your computer (or even better; another computer
or removable media) is the way to go in case disaster strikes.

Hope this helps!
 
YRoady,

Yes that helps a lot! I backup twice a day. It is done automatically so it
happens no matter what. Your feedback helped a lot.
 
I have a question. Is there a need to archive if I have plenty of harddrive
space and I back up my .pst file twice a day? I am not sure I understand the
purpose.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, the amount of hard drive space that you have has no
bearing on the maximum size of your .pst file in Outlook, which is
less than 2GB...at least until Outlook 2003 increases that maximum
size by 10X! Once your .pst size gets close to 2GB, it's going to
become non-functional in Outlook 2002 & earlier versions. Therefore,
the primary purpose of archiving your messages is to keep your data
source at a manageable level.

Hope this helps.
--
Rich Cervenka
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Email Client: Microsoft Outlook 2002
News Client (Text): Forté Agent 1.93 www.forteinc.com
News Client (Binaries): News Rover 8.2.2 www.newsrover.com
 
Rick,

Ok, I see. So until I get close to 2GB I should be fine with just backing
up. THANKS!
 
Back
Top