Anyone used Acronis True Image 9.0 yet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Odie Ferrous
  • Start date Start date
O

Odie Ferrous

Are there any major improvements (from a real-life point of view - not
those expressed by Acronis on their website) over previous versions?


Odie
 
Odie said:
Are there any major improvements (from a real-life point of view - not
those expressed by Acronis on their website) over previous versions?


Odie

Hi!
Look here:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14403089
It's really amazing. People are already exchanging screenshots there:)
I bought an ATI 9 upgrade and it works pretty good: I thought It just
can't be faster but it really is. And what I like a new option appears
that helps add a new HDD to PC and even partition it.
 
Hi!
Look here:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14403089
It's really amazing. People are already exchanging screenshots there:)
I bought an ATI 9 upgrade and it works pretty good: I thought It just
can't be faster but it really is. And what I like a new option appears
that helps add a new HDD to PC and even partition it.


Can True Image now clone individual partitions and put the clone
on a HD that already contains other partitions like Casper XP can?
(I'm not talking about making an "image" file, I'm talking about
making a bootable clone.)

*TimDaniels*
 
Timothy said:
Can True Image now clone individual partitions and put the clone
on a HD that already contains other partitions like Casper XP can?
(I'm not talking about making an "image" file, I'm talking about
making a bootable clone.)

*TimDaniels*


That's the sort of info I want.

Not from someone who sounds as though they have shares in the company,
or from something that sounds like advertising blurb - has anyone
credible actually used it yet?


Odie
 
Can True Image now clone individual partitions and put the clone
on a HD that already contains other partitions like Casper XP can?

Doesnt look like it from the manual which is available for download.

The free trial is available for download too.

It does however have a new fast restore which
reduces the need to do what you want to do.

Quite an interesting approach in many ways, it restores the OS
files first, keeps track of what files the user trys to access once
the restored OS is run, while the rest of the files are being restored
in the background, and gets the ones the user is trying to use first.
(I'm not talking about making an "image" file, I'm talking about making a
bootable clone.)

Its always been a primitive way to do backup.
 
That's the sort of info I want.

The manual and the free test drive are available for download.
Not from someone who sounds as though they have shares
in the company, or from something that sounds like advertising
blurb - has anyone credible actually used it yet?

Hasnt showed up on emule yet.
 
Rod Speed said:
The free trial is available for download too.

The current free trial download may not have the
new features in it, yet.
It does however have a new fast restore which
reduces the need to do what you want to do.

But not faster than a reboot.
Its always been a primitive way to do backup.

It *is* primitive, but hey!, I'm a primitive guy with
immediate needs, and clones require the least
IQ to be back up and running after a hard drive
failure or a system file mangulation.

*TimDaniels*
 
Timothy Daniels said:
Rod Speed wrote
The current free trial download may not have the new features in it, yet.

Corse it does, its a free trial of 9, stupid.
But not faster than a reboot.

Duh. But it very unlikely indeed that you'll ever need it and
that approach doesnt protect you from a hardware failure.

Only a duplicate system do that.
It *is* primitive, but hey!, I'm a primitive guy with immediate needs,

Who is such a bonehead that he doesnt realise
that it only covers one possibility, the OS becoming
unusable, and doesnt do a damned thing about the
MUCH more likely possibility of a hardware failure.
and clones require the least IQ to be back up

Yeah, obviously something you need bad.
and running after a hard drive failure or a system file mangulation.

You dont even need that capability to have that primitive
approach to quick recovery, even someone as stupid as you
should be able to manage to clone the entire drive instead.

Its terminally stupid to be limiting what software you can
use to such a ****ed dinosaur as Casper XP by insisting
on that clone of just a partition instead of the whole drive.
 
Rod Speed said:
Its terminally stupid to be limiting what software you can
use to such a ****ed dinosaur as Casper XP by insisting
on that clone of just a partition instead of the whole drive.


I take it that you're endorsing Casper XP?

*TimDaniels*
 
(e-mail address removed):

The current free trial download may not have the
new features in it, yet.
I think you are confusing 'trial download' with some form of pre-
release edition eg an alpha or beta test version. The latter are
sometimes not feature-complete, but the former usually has all of
the features but is limited in some other way to get you to pay the
licence fee.

You also appear to be confusing Rod Speed with humanity; don't
waste your time arguing with the Rodbot. It habitually resorts to
ad hominen debate when it's losing.
 
McSpreader said:
:


I think you are confusing 'trial download' with some form of pre-
release edition eg an alpha or beta test version. The latter are
sometimes not feature-complete, but the former usually has all of
the features but is limited in some other way to get you to pay the
licence fee.


No, I realize that the free trial version is missing a feature or two
that are in the purchased version. But there is also no statement
that the current free trial version includes or excludes the *new*
features that characterize version 9.

You also appear to be confusing Rod Speed with humanity; don't
waste your time arguing with the Rodbot. It habitually resorts to
ad hominen debate when it's losing.


I realize Rod is a sock puppet, and I only banter with it - as one
would with a child. But the hand up its butt does occasionally
share good information, and so it's worth listening to.

*TimDaniels*
 
Timothy Daniels said:
McSpreader wrote
No, I realize that the free trial version is missing a feature or two that are
in the purchased version.

Just being able to actually do what you specify to do.
But there is also no statement that the current free trial version includes or
excludes the *new* features that characterize version 9.

Doesnt need to be, its clearly labelled as being a free trial of version 9.

<reams of puerile shit flushed where it belongs>
 
Peter said:
There might be some imrovements. But untill they fix some bugs, I would not
rely on this product:
http://64.91.226.241/showthread.php?s=e47cc21126eca8865827ef2b331b329f&t=98587

I agree completely. This product is VERY buggy. For example, you can
create a "secure zone" partition but you will have to buy a copy of
Partition Magic to remove the partition... the removal function doesn't
work. Also, forget using a USB2 drive as a backup target... it doesn't
work. If you think that this review is too severe, check out the
Acronis forum site at
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65
 
Back
Top