B
Brooke
I orginally posted this in the developer group but didn't receive any
responses.
I just recently switched over to VS 2005 and I love the IDE, but I have a
question about VB vs. C# using the 2.0 Framework. I have developed some
simple apps to test the pure speed of the new framework 2.0 vs. 1.1, but in
the process I discovered that VB appears to be much slower than before.
Especially on the compact framework.
I have a simple Towers of Hanoi looping application for both languages and
both frameworks (Desktop and Mobile). The difference on the desktop is not
near as large as on the mobile platform. I develop mobile application so I
am more interested in the compact framework. Listed below are the results
of the test for the compact framework. All apps were release versions.
CF1 - Tower of Hanoi
25 Discs 28 Discs 29 Discs
C# 11.094 secs 90.264 secs 176.711 secs
VB 10.363 secs 81.298 secs 162.115 secs
CF2 - Tower of Hanoi
25 Discs 28 Discs 29 Discs
C# 9.928 secs 78.868 secs 158.123 secs
VB 13.586 secs 108.533 secs 216.583 secs
Thanks
responses.
I just recently switched over to VS 2005 and I love the IDE, but I have a
question about VB vs. C# using the 2.0 Framework. I have developed some
simple apps to test the pure speed of the new framework 2.0 vs. 1.1, but in
the process I discovered that VB appears to be much slower than before.
Especially on the compact framework.
I have a simple Towers of Hanoi looping application for both languages and
both frameworks (Desktop and Mobile). The difference on the desktop is not
near as large as on the mobile platform. I develop mobile application so I
am more interested in the compact framework. Listed below are the results
of the test for the compact framework. All apps were release versions.
CF1 - Tower of Hanoi
25 Discs 28 Discs 29 Discs
C# 11.094 secs 90.264 secs 176.711 secs
VB 10.363 secs 81.298 secs 162.115 secs
CF2 - Tower of Hanoi
25 Discs 28 Discs 29 Discs
C# 9.928 secs 78.868 secs 158.123 secs
VB 13.586 secs 108.533 secs 216.583 secs
Thanks