J
JamesJ
Is it wise to have more than 1 antispyware program performing real-time
protection
at one time?
James
protection
at one time?
James
JamesJ said:Is it wise to have more than 1 antispyware program performing real-time
protection
at one time?
JamesJ said:Is it wise to have more than 1 antispyware program performing real-time
protection
at one time?
James
JamesJ said:Is it wise to have more than 1 antispyware program performing
real-time protection at one time?
JamesJ said:Is it wise to have more than 1 antispyware program performing real-time
protection
at one time?
James
FromTheRafters said:No. Although it is possible to have two antispyware programs (that operate
differently to provide such real-time protection) coexist peacefully on
one machine, it is almost the same situation as having two on-access
antivirus scanners running - which is decidedly *not* recommended.
Best to have 0 - 1 real-time and as many as desired on demand.
Tae Song said:It uses more resources and some instances they can conflict. I had one
user using AVG and a Korean AV software. It prevented them from using
IE... although in some ways that could be considered a very strong virus
protection, but not feasible.
On the other hand, one antivirus software might catch what the other one
missed.
Is it worth having two antivirus programs... I don't think so. You can,
but I don't think it's worth it.
No. Have one antivirus and one antispyware (you have Windows Defender built
into Vista) running and that's it.
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/Too_Much_Security.pdf
Malke