Nope. This is not how Vista does it.
And with all the excellent upgrade posts here, including Colin Barnhorst's I
haven't seen this little issue raised. Suppose that you cannot use Win RE's
major components to repair Vista which would be Startup Repair, System
Restore *from Win RE which I find superior to SR using the Volume Shadow
system adapted from the Windows Server environment, restoring the boot
sector using the bootsect /nt52 SYS from the Windows Recovery Environment
discussed in the MSKB directly below
How to troubleshoot scenarios in which the rollback phase was unsuccessful
after you upgrade from Windows XP to Windows Vista
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927523/en-us
and something that has not been mentioned that I can tell to date on this
group or much in the TBT groups:
How to use the Bootrec.exe tool in the Windows Recovery Environment to
troubleshoot and repair startup issues in Windows Vista
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927392/en-us
Startup Repair can also be used when there is not a problem booting into
Windows Vista and when it works which is not all the time (you should repeat
2-3 times if it does not) fix major broken Vista components:
A Stop error occurs, or the computer stops responding when you try to start
Windows Vista
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925810/en-us
So suppose all these repair modalities used correctly and I emphasize there
are a minority of times when Startup Repair may need to be tried, i.e.
repeated 2-3 times until it works, and you have this scnario mentioned by
George Ou on his ZDNET blog this morning (January 29, 2007) in my time zone:
(I would think you could avoid a lot of "Geek Squad" money by the way by
simply searching this group, the setup group and the other MSFT Vista public
groups using View>Find):
From George Ou and a point that has not been raised that I can tell on this
group or the setup group and certainly has not been touched by Jill Zoeller
or Darrel Gorter who occasionally particpate here from MSFT:
From:
January 29th, 2007
Vista Upgrade Edition is lame by design
by George Ou
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=414&tag=nl.e589
"These new Vista Upgrade DVDs which I'm assuming have already been stamped
out will lack the ability to install on a system unless Windows XP or 2000
was present. This means anyone looking to do a fresh install for any reason
will not be able to. Someone who is doing disaster recovery after a hard
drive failure or a virus infection won't be able to wipe their hard drive
and install Vista, they'll have to install XP first and then install Vista
on top of XP. That could easily mean nearly an hour wasted. If you're
paying someone to rebuild your computer, this will mean an extra hour of
labor that will be billed to you for the installation of Windows XP. Will
Microsoft pick up the extra hour tab from Geek Squad for everyone?"
MSFT's current MSKB covering Upgrades and leaving much out:
How to install Windows Vista (See upgrade section of this MSKB)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918884/en-us
MSFT's Current Upgrade to Vista Page:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/upgradepaths.mspx
Extreme Tech's article on Vista Upgrades:
Upgrade From Windows XP to Vista
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2082979,00.asp
What's the real story with Vista upgrades?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=189
Vista Upgrade Edition is lame by design
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=414&tag=nl.e589
CH