...
...
Surely it's just a simple referencing problem, 256 columns by 65535
rows. Should be pretty simple to change it to 65535 columns by 256
rows? Such a shame! Sigh. Thanks.
...
Nothing could be further from the truth. If you harcode limits like this, and
make much nasty use of bit bashing with index variables, you arrive at the place
Microsoft finds itself: only a pretty thorough rewrite would allow for the
change you suggest. As long as the masses pay full upgrade $$$ for the minor
tweaks & eye wash that make up recent Excel 'upgrades', what incentive does
Microsoft have to fix this?
I agree, however, the trend in software development has usually been
to add more and more functionality in order to meet users needs. In
this case, the extension past 256 columns would seem to be a pretty
basic requirement and IMHO it would greatly improve the
'calendar-related functionality'.
You must not track the actual changes Microsoft has made in the most recent 3
Office/Excel upgrades. 8/98 to 2K did introduce OLAP cubes, finer grained macro
security, and some Data menu enhancements. Legit major version upgrade. 2K to
2002 introduced colored worksheet tabs, full pathnames in print headers/footers,
Task Pains (spelling intentional), and a few stats function fixes. 2002 to 2003
brought a few more function fixes and some more user interface changes that make
it harder still just to use the spreadsheet.
What application would you suggest for a task such as this? Thanks.
Do you use either Outlook (full-blown) with Exchange, Lotus Notes or any other
form of Groupware? If so, there should be some way to use the system to handle
days on or off.