D
D
Derek Baker
Derek said:
More reaction here:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=28&threadid=1370368&enterthread=y
J
jack
: http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2158&p=1
:
: Read the comments.
Yawn. The usual boring dribble coming from Anand. Sorta comparing
apples to oranges, isn't it? Maybe this lamer should team up with
Tom [aka Tom Pabst at Toms Hardware Guide] as they are simply unable
to do "good science."
J.
:
: Read the comments.
Yawn. The usual boring dribble coming from Anand. Sorta comparing
apples to oranges, isn't it? Maybe this lamer should team up with
Tom [aka Tom Pabst at Toms Hardware Guide] as they are simply unable
to do "good science."
J.
E
Evgenij Barsukov
jack said:
My problem with this review is that they compared highest level Xeon (which is
a processor designed to run in servers and has planty of cache) with AMD64 2500+
which is a PC processor that cost 600$ less. Why did they not compare
Xeon with the Opteron that has comparable amount of cache?
That would make a lot more sence from all points of view.
Regards,
Evgenij
__________________________________________________
*science&fiction*free programs*fine art*phylosophy:
http://sudy_zhenja.tripod.com
----------remove hate_spam to answer--------------
S
Scott
jack said:
My sentiments exactly. To me, they are a boring babble.................
E
Evgenij Barsukov
some serious ass kicking by 600$ Opteron of 850$ Xeon,JK said:
specialy in database apps which is what mostly matters
in servers.
Regards,
Evgenij
--
__________________________________________________
*science&fiction*free programs*fine art*phylosophy:
http://sudy_zhenja.tripod.com
----------remove hate_spam to answer--------------